SIMULATED FIXTURE NOT A LIVE AUDIT

Evidence into action.

See what was found, what needs review, and who should act next.

https://northstar.example/product

01 / SCOPE & STATUS

What this audit covers.

partial
SELECTED SCOPE3 pagesExact URLs selected by you
OBSERVATION MODEControlled fixtureNo live page was fetched
REPORT CREATED · UTC2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00Expiry: Not applicable: fictional public sample
WEBSITE EVIDENCE

The numbers behind this report.

Rule states, not a GEO score

Technical checks

30 instances
Technical rule states. Confirmed pass: 15. Confirmed issue: 2. Needs review: 4. Not obtained: 1. Not run: 3. Not applicable: 5.
15 Confirmed pass2 Confirmed issue4 Needs review1 Not obtained3 Not run5 Not applicable
Technical pass rate · 15 / 17. pass / pass + fail instances.

Technical pass rate

88.24%

15 / 17 pass / pass + fail instances

Determined coverage · 17 / 25. determined / applicable planned instances.

Determined coverage

68.00%

17 / 25 determined / applicable planned instances

Content review

25 instances
Content rule states. Confirmed pass: 0. Confirmed issue: 0. Needs review: 25. Not obtained: 0. Not run: 0. Not applicable: 0.
0 Confirmed pass0 Confirmed issue25 Needs review0 Not obtained0 Not run0 Not applicable
43distinct retained evidence itemsReview content evidence ↗

One count per unique rule instance. Unknown and unrun checks are neither pass nor fail. Content states describe review status, not content quality.

AI ANSWER EVIDENCE SIMULATED · NO LIVE SAMPLES

Evidence for each platform.

Inspect answers ↗

ChatGPT

Imported evidence

12 provided · 10 valid · 2 failed

Planned samples provided SIMULATED

Brand mention
30.00% Brand mention · Complete plan; valid records only. 3 / 10 positive / judgeableComplete plan; valid records only
Original citation
20.00% Original citation · Complete plan; valid records only. 2 / 10 positive / judgeableComplete plan; valid records only
Valid-plan coverage
83.33%10 / 12 valid / plannedSampling manifest supplied; recorded failures remain excluded from valid records.
Sampling conditions
Mode
web_search
Questions
Non-brand commercial
Region / language
US / en-US
Model
Not disclosed
View group

Perplexity

Imported evidence

12 provided · 12 valid · 0 failed

Planned samples provided SIMULATED

Brand mention
58.33% Brand mention · Complete plan; valid records only. 7 / 12 positive / judgeableComplete plan; valid records only
Original citation
41.67% Original citation · Complete plan; valid records only. 5 / 12 positive / judgeableComplete plan; valid records only
Valid-plan coverage
100.00%12 / 12 valid / plannedSampling manifest supplied; recorded failures remain excluded from valid records.
Sampling conditions
Mode
web_search
Questions
Non-brand commercial
Region / language
US / en-US
Model
Not disclosed
View group

Gemini

Imported evidence

12 provided · 10 valid · 2 failed

Planned samples provided SIMULATED

Brand mention
30.00% Brand mention · Complete plan; valid records only. 3 / 10 positive / judgeableComplete plan; valid records only
Original citation
33.33% Original citation · Judgeable subset only. 4 unknown, excluded from judgeable denominator. 2 / 6 positive / judgeableJudgeable subset only · 4 unknown6 / 10 valid records judgeable · 60.00% judgment coverage
Valid-plan coverage
83.33%10 / 12 valid / plannedSampling manifest supplied; recorded failures remain excluded from valid records.
Sampling conditions
Mode
web_search
Questions
Non-brand commercial
Region / language
GB / en-GB
Model
Not disclosed
View group

Claude

Imported evidence

8 provided · 6 valid · 2 failed

Incomplete plan SIMULATED

Brand mention
33.33% Brand mention · Judgeable subset only. 2 / 6 positive / judgeableJudgeable subset only
Original citation
0.00% Original citation · Judgeable subset only. 0 / 6 positive / judgeableJudgeable subset only
Valid-plan coverage
50.00%6 / 12 valid / plannedSampling manifest supplied; recorded failures remain excluded from valid records.
Sampling conditions
Mode
plain_chat
Questions
Brand questions
Region / language
US / en-US
Model
Not disclosed
View group

No platform was sampled automatically. Website checks do not measure AI mentions or citations. Simulated answer evidence; no platforms were sampled. Source unverified. Separate samples; no combined platform score.

Selected URLs & saved acquisition details 3 selected
01
INPUT URL

https://northstar.example/product

FINAL URL

https://northstar.example/product

02
INPUT URL

https://northstar.example/implementation

FINAL URL

https://northstar.example/implementation

03
INPUT URL

https://northstar.example/guide

FINAL URL

https://northstar.example/guide

Unavailable evidence & counting method

Counts use unique page/rule instances; site rules count once. Unknowns and unrun checks are never passes or failures. Content review and AI answers have separate counts.

02 / ISSUES & NEXT STEPS

What needs attention.

2confirmed issues

Start with the confirmed rule failures below. Review actions require a decision before editing.

Confirmed issues 2

Repair the invalid JSON-LD block

Confirmed · P2
Observation & why it matters

Syntax and declared types do not prove factual quality or citation.

Present JSON-LD parses as objects or arrays.

Saved evidence
{'blocks': 1, 'types': [], 'errors': [{'block': 0, 'error': 'JSONDecodeError'}], 'duplicate_keys': [], 'same_id_differences': [], 'traversal_limited': False}
Locate this evidenceOpen this saved source item →
URL
https://northstar.example/product
Raw-source location
raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]
Snapshot
sample-product.json
Saved-byte SHA-256
7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

A hash detects changes to saved bytes; it does not prove source authenticity.

Next step

Locate JSON-LD block 1 in the saved script (raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]). Recorded parser/shape issue: JSONDecodeError. Repair the indicated block and verify its facts.

Acceptance check

Re-fetch this exact URL and parse the corrected JSON-LD block 1; verify the recorded error is absent and retained JSON-LD types remain intentional. Repeat the same selected URL with rule R06 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json].

Owner, dependencies & original finding
Responsible role
Developer
Needed before editing
Confirm page intent and locate the responsible CMS/template setting before editing.
Implementation location
CMS / template / file: to be located.
Original rule
R06 v1.0.0 · fail
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Evidence mode
controlled_fixture
Locate the original R06 evidence →

Add a document title for this page

Confirmed · P2
Observation & why it matters

Only raw title, headings and language were observed; semantic purpose needs owner review.

A descriptive title with reviewed headings, language and purpose.

Saved evidence
{'titles': [], 'h1': ['Northstar workspace for support teams'], 'lang': 'en-US', 'raw_text_chars': 1408, 'possible_js_shell': False}
Locate this evidenceOpen this saved source item →
URL
https://northstar.example/product
Raw-source location
raw_html: title, h1, html[lang]
Snapshot
sample-product.json
Saved-byte SHA-256
7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

A hash detects changes to saved bytes; it does not prove source authenticity.

Next step

Confirm page purpose and locate title/H1/language configuration; add an accurate title if missing.

Acceptance check

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R08 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: title, h1, html[lang].

Owner, dependencies & original finding
Responsible role
Content editor
Needed before editing
Confirm page intent and locate the responsible CMS/template setting before editing.
Implementation location
CMS / template / file: to be located.
Original rule
R08 v1.0.0 · fail
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Evidence mode
controlled_fixture
Locate the original R08 evidence →

Specific review actions 3

Check the specific heading transitions and repeated passages

Review before editing
Observation & why it matters

Retained HTML contains 1 forward heading-level jumps and 0 exact repeated paragraph groups.

The structure is observable; intentional nesting and useful policy reuse still require an editor's decision.

Saved evidence
What the workspace does
Locate this evidenceOpen this saved source item →
URL
https://northstar.example/product
Raw-source location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)
Context
Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture. What the workspace does Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner.
Snapshot
sample-product.json
Saved-byte SHA-256
7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

A hash detects changes to saved bytes; it does not prove source authenticity.

Saved evidence
Plan options
Locate this evidenceOpen this saved source item →
URL
https://northstar.example/product
Raw-source location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h4:nth-of-type(1)
Context
Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner. Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
Snapshot
sample-product.json
Saved-byte SHA-256
7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

A hash detects changes to saved bytes; it does not prove source authenticity.

Next step

Compare the cited headings with their section relationship. Change the level only if it misrepresents that relationship. For repeated text, document its purpose; remove or consolidate only unnecessary repetition.

Acceptance check

The editor records a decision for each cited transition/reuse. Re-extraction matches the intended outline and any retained repetition has an explanation.

Owner, dependencies & original finding
Responsible role
Content editor / business owner
Needed before editing
Editor confirms section nesting and whether reuse is intentional.
Implementation location
CMS / template / file: to be located.
Original rule
C03 v2.0.0 · needs review
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Evidence mode
controlled_fixture
Locate the original C03 evidence →

Reconcile the cited amounts under matching offer conditions

Review before editing
Observation & why it matters

1 currency groups contain different literal amounts; a like-for-like conflict has not been established.

Different products, tiers, regions, historic prices and quotations can legitimately have different amounts.

Saved evidence
Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture.
Locate this evidenceOpen this saved source item →
URL
https://northstar.example/product
Raw-source location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)
Context
Northstar workspace for support teams Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture. What the workspace does
Snapshot
sample-product.json
Saved-byte SHA-256
7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

A hash detects changes to saved bytes; it does not prove source authenticity.

Saved evidence
The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
Locate this evidenceOpen this saved source item →
URL
https://northstar.example/product
Raw-source location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)
Context
Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
Snapshot
sample-product.json
Saved-byte SHA-256
7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

A hash detects changes to saved bytes; it does not prove source authenticity.

Next step

For each cited amount, record product/variant, package, region and effective date. Compare only matching offers with the owner's dated price record; correct or qualify text only after confirming a mismatch.

Acceptance check

Each compared statement has an offer/region/date label and an authoritative record; any verified conflict is corrected, or the legitimate difference is documented.

Owner, dependencies & original finding
Responsible role
Business owner / content editor
Needed before editing
Business owner supplies dated offer facts; editor preserves negation, quotation and historical context.
Implementation location
CMS / template / file: to be located.
Original rule
C04 v2.0.0 · needs review
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Evidence mode
controlled_fixture
Locate the original C04 evidence →

Verify the source behind these exact claim candidates

Review before editing
Observation & why it matters

1 retained claim candidates have unverified source support.

A number or nearby link identifies review work; it does not prove the statement is false or supported.

Saved evidence
There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.
Locate this evidenceOpen this saved source item →
URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Raw-source location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)
Context
Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded? There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.
Snapshot
sample-guide.json
Saved-byte SHA-256
3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

A hash detects changes to saved bytes; it does not prove source authenticity.

Next step

Open the cited passage in context. Identify claim ownership, then record the original source and exact supporting passage, date, method and conditions. Qualify or remove the claim only if that review establishes a problem.

Acceptance check

The reviewer records a support decision, source passage and applicable conditions for each candidate. Unsupported wording is corrected with owner approval.

Owner, dependencies & original finding
Responsible role
Content editor / business owner
Needed before editing
Claim owner supplies the original supporting source; editor verifies quotations, denials and historical context.
Implementation location
CMS / template / file: to be located.
Original rule
C05 v2.0.0 · needs review
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Evidence mode
controlled_fixture
Locate the original C05 evidence →

Actions use saved selected-page evidence. Review tasks are not confirmed defects; no traffic, ranking or AI-citation gain is predicted. Showing 5 of 14 available actions; all original findings remain below.

EXPLORE THE FINDINGS

55 of 55 findings match filters

Filters affect website findings, content findings, and handoff rows. Priority is an action order, not a predicted business outcome.

03 / WEBSITE EVIDENCE

The technical foundation.

30 observations

Response behavior, directives, structured data, and links within the selected scope. Open a finding to inspect the saved evidence and retest steps.

Inspect technical observations 30 saved findings
R01 HTTP response and completenesshttps://northstar.example/product pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R01 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

An HTTP response does not establish indexing.

SOURCE EXCERPTresponse.status_code; response.headers; response.complete
{'http_status': 200, 'content_type': 'text/html; charset=utf-8', 'complete': True, 'error': None}
Inspect the saved observations
Http status
200
Content type
text/html; charset=utf-8
Complete
Yes
Error
Not obtained
NEXT ACTION

Inspect access policy and the exact response; resolve observed failure if unintended.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R01 v1.0.0; inspect response.status_code; response.headers; response.complete.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Complete successful HTML response
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
An HTTP response does not establish indexing.
Evidence location
response.status_code; response.headers; response.complete
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

response.status_code; response.headers; response.complete

{'http_status': 200, 'content_type': 'text/html; charset=utf-8', 'complete': True, 'error': None}

Original rule guidance

Inspect access policy and the exact response; resolve observed failure if unintended.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R01 v1.0.0; inspect response.status_code; response.headers; response.complete.

Complete saved observation

{
  "complete": true,
  "content_type": "text/html; charset=utf-8",
  "error": null,
  "http_status": 200
}
R02 Redirect path and scopehttps://northstar.example/product pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R02 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Saved redirects describe observed routing only.

SOURCE EXCERPTresponse.redirect_chain
[]
Inspect the saved observations None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Review route configuration; keep the requested page scope explicit.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R02 v1.0.0; inspect response.redirect_chain.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
The selected URL resolves within the permitted scope and limits.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Saved redirects describe observed routing only.
Evidence location
response.redirect_chain
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

response.redirect_chain

[]

Original rule guidance

Review route configuration; keep the requested page scope explicit.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R02 v1.0.0; inspect response.redirect_chain.

Complete saved observation

[]
R04 Indexing directives and intenthttps://northstar.example/product pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R04 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Intentional noindex is not automatically a defect. Raw directives are preserved even if a later DOM differs.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag
{'meta': [{'name': 'robots', 'content': 'index'}], 'x_robots_tag': '', 'confirmed_intent': None, 'raw_noindex': False, 'header_directives': []}
Inspect the saved observations
Meta
  • Name
    robots
    Content
    index
X robots tag
Confirmed intent
Not obtained
Raw noindex
No
Header directives
None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Confirm intent and crawler scope, then locate and correct only conflicting source/header directives.

SEO owner / developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R04 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Observed directives agree with explicitly confirmed indexing intent.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Intentional noindex is not automatically a defect. Raw directives are preserved even if a later DOM differs.
Evidence location
raw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag

{'meta': [{'name': 'robots', 'content': 'index'}], 'x_robots_tag': '', 'confirmed_intent': None, 'raw_noindex': False, 'header_directives': []}

Original rule guidance

Confirm intent and crawler scope, then locate and correct only conflicting source/header directives.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R04 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag.

Complete saved observation

{
  "confirmed_intent": null,
  "header_directives": [],
  "meta": [
    {
      "content": "index",
      "name": "robots"
    }
  ],
  "raw_noindex": false,
  "x_robots_tag": ""
}
R05 Canonical declarationshttps://northstar.example/product pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R05 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

A declared canonical does not establish Google's selected canonical.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link
{'declarations': ['https://northstar.example/product'], 'resolved': ['https://northstar.example/product'], 'base_url': 'https://northstar.example/product', 'http_link': ''}
Inspect the saved observations
Declarations
  • https://northstar.example/product
Resolved
  • https://northstar.example/product
Base url
https://northstar.example/product
Http link
NEXT ACTION

Confirm the intended URL, locate the canonical configuration and remove conflicting or invalid declarations.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R05 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
One unambiguous valid canonical declaration.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
A declared canonical does not establish Google's selected canonical.
Evidence location
raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link

{'declarations': ['https://northstar.example/product'], 'resolved': ['https://northstar.example/product'], 'base_url': 'https://northstar.example/product', 'http_link': ''}

Original rule guidance

Confirm the intended URL, locate the canonical configuration and remove conflicting or invalid declarations.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R05 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link.

Complete saved observation

{
  "base_url": "https://northstar.example/product",
  "declarations": [
    "https://northstar.example/product"
  ],
  "http_link": "",
  "resolved": [
    "https://northstar.example/product"
  ]
}
R06 Structured data syntax and typeshttps://northstar.example/product fail
P2 · medium severitycontrolled fixture · R06 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Syntax and declared types do not prove factual quality or citation.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]
{'blocks': 1, 'types': [], 'errors': [{'block': 0, 'error': 'JSONDecodeError'}], 'duplicate_keys': [], 'same_id_differences': [], 'traversal_limited': False}
Inspect the saved observations
Blocks
1
Types
None recorded in this field
Errors
  • Block
    0
    Error
    JSONDecodeError
Duplicate keys
None recorded in this field
Same id differences
None recorded in this field
Traversal limited
No
NEXT ACTION

Locate JSON-LD block 1 in the saved script (raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]). Recorded parser/shape issue: JSONDecodeError. Repair the indicated block and verify its facts.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-fetch this exact URL and parse the corrected JSON-LD block 1; verify the recorded error is absent and retained JSON-LD types remain intentional. Repeat the same selected URL with rule R06 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json].

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Present JSON-LD parses as objects or arrays.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Syntax and declared types do not prove factual quality or citation.
Evidence location
raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]

{'blocks': 1, 'types': [], 'errors': [{'block': 0, 'error': 'JSONDecodeError'}], 'duplicate_keys': [], 'same_id_differences': [], 'traversal_limited': False}

Original rule guidance

Repair the indicated block and verify its facts.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R06 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json].

Complete saved observation

{
  "blocks": 1,
  "duplicate_keys": [],
  "errors": [
    {
      "block": 0,
      "error": "JSONDecodeError"
    }
  ],
  "same_id_differences": [],
  "traversal_limited": false,
  "types": []
}
R07 Raw and rendered contenthttps://northstar.example/product not run
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R07 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Live JavaScript rendering is not implemented; supplied DOM fixtures are simulations.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1)
{'rendered': False, 'raw_noindex': False, 'dom_differs': None, 'rendered_snapshot_ref': None}
Inspect the saved observations
Rendered
No
Raw noindex
No
Dom differs
Not obtained
Rendered snapshot ref
Not obtained
NEXT ACTION

If needed, authorize controlled rendering with the same network protections and preserve both snapshots.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R07 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1).

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Separate raw and rendered observations before judging final content.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Live JavaScript rendering is not implemented; supplied DOM fixtures are simulations.
Evidence location
raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1)

{'rendered': False, 'raw_noindex': False, 'dom_differs': None, 'rendered_snapshot_ref': None}

Original rule guidance

If needed, authorize controlled rendering with the same network protections and preserve both snapshots.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R07 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1).

Complete saved observation

{
  "dom_differs": null,
  "raw_noindex": false,
  "rendered": false,
  "rendered_snapshot_ref": null
}
R08 Title, headings and languagehttps://northstar.example/product fail
P2 · medium severitycontrolled fixture · R08 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Only raw title, headings and language were observed; semantic purpose needs owner review.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: title, h1, html[lang]
{'titles': [], 'h1': ['Northstar workspace for support teams'], 'lang': 'en-US', 'raw_text_chars': 1408, 'possible_js_shell': False}
Inspect the saved observations
Titles
None recorded in this field
H1
  • Northstar workspace for support teams
Lang
en-US
Raw text chars
1408
Possible js shell
No
NEXT ACTION

Confirm page purpose and locate title/H1/language configuration; add an accurate title if missing.

Content editor

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R08 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: title, h1, html[lang].

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
A descriptive title with reviewed headings, language and purpose.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Only raw title, headings and language were observed; semantic purpose needs owner review.
Evidence location
raw_html: title, h1, html[lang]
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: title, h1, html[lang]

{'titles': [], 'h1': ['Northstar workspace for support teams'], 'lang': 'en-US', 'raw_text_chars': 1408, 'possible_js_shell': False}

Original rule guidance

Confirm page purpose and locate title/H1/language configuration; add an accurate title if missing.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R08 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: title, h1, html[lang].

Complete saved observation

{
  "h1": [
    "Northstar workspace for support teams"
  ],
  "lang": "en-US",
  "possible_js_shell": false,
  "raw_text_chars": 1408,
  "titles": []
}
R10 Confirmed business factshttps://northstar.example/product needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R10 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Only a whole conflicting statement with explicitly user-confirmed context is a failure; phrases, negation and missing expected wording need review.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts
[]
Inspect the saved observations None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Verify the business source/date, reconcile the quoted conflicting phrase and review context.

Business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R10 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Literal page claims agree with user-confirmed business facts.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Only a whole conflicting statement with explicitly user-confirmed context is a failure; phrases, negation and missing expected wording need review.
Evidence location
raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts

[]

Original rule guidance

Verify the business source/date, reconcile the quoted conflicting phrase and review context.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R10 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts.

Complete saved observation

[]
R12 Selected claims and sourceshttps://northstar.example/product not applicable
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R12 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Attribution and source quality require human review. No claim inventory was inferred.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims
[]
Inspect the saved observations None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Locate each selected claim's original source, date and surrounding context; confirm it with the content owner.

Content editor

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R12 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Selected claims have verified original sources, dates and context.
Applicability
not applicable
Severity basis
Attribution and source quality require human review. No claim inventory was inferred.
Evidence location
raw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims

[]

Original rule guidance

Locate each selected claim's original source, date and surrounding context; confirm it with the content owner.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R12 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims.

Complete saved observation

[]
R01 HTTP response and completenesshttps://northstar.example/implementation pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R01 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

An HTTP response does not establish indexing.

SOURCE EXCERPTresponse.status_code; response.headers; response.complete
{'http_status': 200, 'content_type': 'text/html; charset=utf-8', 'complete': True, 'error': None}
Inspect the saved observations
Http status
200
Content type
text/html; charset=utf-8
Complete
Yes
Error
Not obtained
NEXT ACTION

Inspect access policy and the exact response; resolve observed failure if unintended.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R01 v1.0.0; inspect response.status_code; response.headers; response.complete.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Complete successful HTML response
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
An HTTP response does not establish indexing.
Evidence location
response.status_code; response.headers; response.complete
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

response.status_code; response.headers; response.complete

{'http_status': 200, 'content_type': 'text/html; charset=utf-8', 'complete': True, 'error': None}

Original rule guidance

Inspect access policy and the exact response; resolve observed failure if unintended.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R01 v1.0.0; inspect response.status_code; response.headers; response.complete.

Complete saved observation

{
  "complete": true,
  "content_type": "text/html; charset=utf-8",
  "error": null,
  "http_status": 200
}
R02 Redirect path and scopehttps://northstar.example/implementation pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R02 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Saved redirects describe observed routing only.

SOURCE EXCERPTresponse.redirect_chain
[]
Inspect the saved observations None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Review route configuration; keep the requested page scope explicit.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R02 v1.0.0; inspect response.redirect_chain.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
The selected URL resolves within the permitted scope and limits.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Saved redirects describe observed routing only.
Evidence location
response.redirect_chain
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

response.redirect_chain

[]

Original rule guidance

Review route configuration; keep the requested page scope explicit.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R02 v1.0.0; inspect response.redirect_chain.

Complete saved observation

[]
R04 Indexing directives and intenthttps://northstar.example/implementation pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R04 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Intentional noindex is not automatically a defect. Raw directives are preserved even if a later DOM differs.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag
{'meta': [], 'x_robots_tag': '', 'confirmed_intent': None, 'raw_noindex': False, 'header_directives': []}
Inspect the saved observations
Meta
None recorded in this field
X robots tag
Confirmed intent
Not obtained
Raw noindex
No
Header directives
None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Confirm intent and crawler scope, then locate and correct only conflicting source/header directives.

SEO owner / developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R04 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Observed directives agree with explicitly confirmed indexing intent.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Intentional noindex is not automatically a defect. Raw directives are preserved even if a later DOM differs.
Evidence location
raw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag

{'meta': [], 'x_robots_tag': '', 'confirmed_intent': None, 'raw_noindex': False, 'header_directives': []}

Original rule guidance

Confirm intent and crawler scope, then locate and correct only conflicting source/header directives.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R04 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag.

Complete saved observation

{
  "confirmed_intent": null,
  "header_directives": [],
  "meta": [],
  "raw_noindex": false,
  "x_robots_tag": ""
}
R05 Canonical declarationshttps://northstar.example/implementation pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R05 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

A declared canonical does not establish Google's selected canonical.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link
{'declarations': ['https://northstar.example/implementation'], 'resolved': ['https://northstar.example/implementation'], 'base_url': 'https://northstar.example/implementation', 'http_link': ''}
Inspect the saved observations
Declarations
  • https://northstar.example/implementation
Resolved
  • https://northstar.example/implementation
Base url
https://northstar.example/implementation
Http link
NEXT ACTION

Confirm the intended URL, locate the canonical configuration and remove conflicting or invalid declarations.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R05 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
One unambiguous valid canonical declaration.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
A declared canonical does not establish Google's selected canonical.
Evidence location
raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link

{'declarations': ['https://northstar.example/implementation'], 'resolved': ['https://northstar.example/implementation'], 'base_url': 'https://northstar.example/implementation', 'http_link': ''}

Original rule guidance

Confirm the intended URL, locate the canonical configuration and remove conflicting or invalid declarations.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R05 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link.

Complete saved observation

{
  "base_url": "https://northstar.example/implementation",
  "declarations": [
    "https://northstar.example/implementation"
  ],
  "http_link": "",
  "resolved": [
    "https://northstar.example/implementation"
  ]
}
R06 Structured data syntax and typeshttps://northstar.example/implementation not applicable
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R06 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Syntax and declared types do not prove factual quality or citation.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]
{'blocks': 0, 'types': [], 'errors': [], 'duplicate_keys': [], 'same_id_differences': [], 'traversal_limited': False}
Inspect the saved observations
Blocks
0
Types
None recorded in this field
Errors
None recorded in this field
Duplicate keys
None recorded in this field
Same id differences
None recorded in this field
Traversal limited
No
NEXT ACTION

Keep structured facts consistent with visible content.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R06 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json].

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Present JSON-LD parses as objects or arrays.
Applicability
not applicable
Severity basis
Syntax and declared types do not prove factual quality or citation.
Evidence location
raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]

{'blocks': 0, 'types': [], 'errors': [], 'duplicate_keys': [], 'same_id_differences': [], 'traversal_limited': False}

Original rule guidance

Keep structured facts consistent with visible content.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R06 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json].

Complete saved observation

{
  "blocks": 0,
  "duplicate_keys": [],
  "errors": [],
  "same_id_differences": [],
  "traversal_limited": false,
  "types": []
}
R07 Raw and rendered contenthttps://northstar.example/implementation not run
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R07 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Live JavaScript rendering is not implemented; supplied DOM fixtures are simulations.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1)
{'rendered': False, 'raw_noindex': False, 'dom_differs': None, 'rendered_snapshot_ref': None}
Inspect the saved observations
Rendered
No
Raw noindex
No
Dom differs
Not obtained
Rendered snapshot ref
Not obtained
NEXT ACTION

If needed, authorize controlled rendering with the same network protections and preserve both snapshots.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R07 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1).

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Separate raw and rendered observations before judging final content.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Live JavaScript rendering is not implemented; supplied DOM fixtures are simulations.
Evidence location
raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1)

{'rendered': False, 'raw_noindex': False, 'dom_differs': None, 'rendered_snapshot_ref': None}

Original rule guidance

If needed, authorize controlled rendering with the same network protections and preserve both snapshots.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R07 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1).

Complete saved observation

{
  "dom_differs": null,
  "raw_noindex": false,
  "rendered": false,
  "rendered_snapshot_ref": null
}
R08 Title, headings and languagehttps://northstar.example/implementation pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R08 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Only raw title, headings and language were observed; semantic purpose needs owner review.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: title, h1, html[lang]
{'titles': ['Northstar implementation service'], 'h1': ['A guided setup for small support teams'], 'lang': 'en-US', 'raw_text_chars': 1051, 'possible_js_shell': False}
Inspect the saved observations
Titles
  • Northstar implementation service
H1
  • A guided setup for small support teams
Lang
en-US
Raw text chars
1051
Possible js shell
No
NEXT ACTION

Confirm page purpose and locate title/H1/language configuration; add an accurate title if missing.

Content editor

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R08 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: title, h1, html[lang].

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
A descriptive title with reviewed headings, language and purpose.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Only raw title, headings and language were observed; semantic purpose needs owner review.
Evidence location
raw_html: title, h1, html[lang]
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: title, h1, html[lang]

{'titles': ['Northstar implementation service'], 'h1': ['A guided setup for small support teams'], 'lang': 'en-US', 'raw_text_chars': 1051, 'possible_js_shell': False}

Original rule guidance

Confirm page purpose and locate title/H1/language configuration; add an accurate title if missing.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R08 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: title, h1, html[lang].

Complete saved observation

{
  "h1": [
    "A guided setup for small support teams"
  ],
  "lang": "en-US",
  "possible_js_shell": false,
  "raw_text_chars": 1051,
  "titles": [
    "Northstar implementation service"
  ]
}
R10 Confirmed business factshttps://northstar.example/implementation needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R10 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Only a whole conflicting statement with explicitly user-confirmed context is a failure; phrases, negation and missing expected wording need review.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts
[]
Inspect the saved observations None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Verify the business source/date, reconcile the quoted conflicting phrase and review context.

Business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R10 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Literal page claims agree with user-confirmed business facts.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Only a whole conflicting statement with explicitly user-confirmed context is a failure; phrases, negation and missing expected wording need review.
Evidence location
raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts

[]

Original rule guidance

Verify the business source/date, reconcile the quoted conflicting phrase and review context.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R10 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts.

Complete saved observation

[]
R12 Selected claims and sourceshttps://northstar.example/implementation not applicable
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R12 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Attribution and source quality require human review. No claim inventory was inferred.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims
[]
Inspect the saved observations None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Locate each selected claim's original source, date and surrounding context; confirm it with the content owner.

Content editor

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R12 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Selected claims have verified original sources, dates and context.
Applicability
not applicable
Severity basis
Attribution and source quality require human review. No claim inventory was inferred.
Evidence location
raw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims

[]

Original rule guidance

Locate each selected claim's original source, date and surrounding context; confirm it with the content owner.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R12 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims.

Complete saved observation

[]
R01 HTTP response and completenesshttps://northstar.example/guide pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R01 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

An HTTP response does not establish indexing.

SOURCE EXCERPTresponse.status_code; response.headers; response.complete
{'http_status': 200, 'content_type': 'text/html; charset=utf-8', 'complete': True, 'error': None}
Inspect the saved observations
Http status
200
Content type
text/html; charset=utf-8
Complete
Yes
Error
Not obtained
NEXT ACTION

Inspect access policy and the exact response; resolve observed failure if unintended.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R01 v1.0.0; inspect response.status_code; response.headers; response.complete.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Complete successful HTML response
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
An HTTP response does not establish indexing.
Evidence location
response.status_code; response.headers; response.complete
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

response.status_code; response.headers; response.complete

{'http_status': 200, 'content_type': 'text/html; charset=utf-8', 'complete': True, 'error': None}

Original rule guidance

Inspect access policy and the exact response; resolve observed failure if unintended.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R01 v1.0.0; inspect response.status_code; response.headers; response.complete.

Complete saved observation

{
  "complete": true,
  "content_type": "text/html; charset=utf-8",
  "error": null,
  "http_status": 200
}
R02 Redirect path and scopehttps://northstar.example/guide pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R02 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Saved redirects describe observed routing only.

SOURCE EXCERPTresponse.redirect_chain
[]
Inspect the saved observations None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Review route configuration; keep the requested page scope explicit.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R02 v1.0.0; inspect response.redirect_chain.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
The selected URL resolves within the permitted scope and limits.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Saved redirects describe observed routing only.
Evidence location
response.redirect_chain
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

response.redirect_chain

[]

Original rule guidance

Review route configuration; keep the requested page scope explicit.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R02 v1.0.0; inspect response.redirect_chain.

Complete saved observation

[]
R04 Indexing directives and intenthttps://northstar.example/guide pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R04 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Intentional noindex is not automatically a defect. Raw directives are preserved even if a later DOM differs.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag
{'meta': [], 'x_robots_tag': '', 'confirmed_intent': None, 'raw_noindex': False, 'header_directives': []}
Inspect the saved observations
Meta
None recorded in this field
X robots tag
Confirmed intent
Not obtained
Raw noindex
No
Header directives
None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Confirm intent and crawler scope, then locate and correct only conflicting source/header directives.

SEO owner / developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R04 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Observed directives agree with explicitly confirmed indexing intent.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Intentional noindex is not automatically a defect. Raw directives are preserved even if a later DOM differs.
Evidence location
raw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag

{'meta': [], 'x_robots_tag': '', 'confirmed_intent': None, 'raw_noindex': False, 'header_directives': []}

Original rule guidance

Confirm intent and crawler scope, then locate and correct only conflicting source/header directives.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R04 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: meta[name]; response.headers.x-robots-tag.

Complete saved observation

{
  "confirmed_intent": null,
  "header_directives": [],
  "meta": [],
  "raw_noindex": false,
  "x_robots_tag": ""
}
R05 Canonical declarationshttps://northstar.example/guide needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R05 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

A declared canonical does not establish Google's selected canonical.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link
{'declarations': [], 'resolved': [], 'base_url': 'https://northstar.example/guide', 'http_link': ''}
Inspect the saved observations
Declarations
None recorded in this field
Resolved
None recorded in this field
Base url
https://northstar.example/guide
Http link
NEXT ACTION

Confirm the intended URL, locate the canonical configuration and remove conflicting or invalid declarations.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R05 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
One unambiguous valid canonical declaration.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
A declared canonical does not establish Google's selected canonical.
Evidence location
raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link

{'declarations': [], 'resolved': [], 'base_url': 'https://northstar.example/guide', 'http_link': ''}

Original rule guidance

Confirm the intended URL, locate the canonical configuration and remove conflicting or invalid declarations.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R05 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link.

Complete saved observation

{
  "base_url": "https://northstar.example/guide",
  "declarations": [],
  "http_link": "",
  "resolved": []
}
R06 Structured data syntax and typeshttps://northstar.example/guide not applicable
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R06 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Syntax and declared types do not prove factual quality or citation.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]
{'blocks': 0, 'types': [], 'errors': [], 'duplicate_keys': [], 'same_id_differences': [], 'traversal_limited': False}
Inspect the saved observations
Blocks
0
Types
None recorded in this field
Errors
None recorded in this field
Duplicate keys
None recorded in this field
Same id differences
None recorded in this field
Traversal limited
No
NEXT ACTION

Keep structured facts consistent with visible content.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R06 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json].

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Present JSON-LD parses as objects or arrays.
Applicability
not applicable
Severity basis
Syntax and declared types do not prove factual quality or citation.
Evidence location
raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]

{'blocks': 0, 'types': [], 'errors': [], 'duplicate_keys': [], 'same_id_differences': [], 'traversal_limited': False}

Original rule guidance

Keep structured facts consistent with visible content.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R06 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json].

Complete saved observation

{
  "blocks": 0,
  "duplicate_keys": [],
  "errors": [],
  "same_id_differences": [],
  "traversal_limited": false,
  "types": []
}
R07 Raw and rendered contenthttps://northstar.example/guide not run
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R07 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Live JavaScript rendering is not implemented; supplied DOM fixtures are simulations.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1)
{'rendered': False, 'raw_noindex': False, 'dom_differs': None, 'rendered_snapshot_ref': None}
Inspect the saved observations
Rendered
No
Raw noindex
No
Dom differs
Not obtained
Rendered snapshot ref
Not obtained
NEXT ACTION

If needed, authorize controlled rendering with the same network protections and preserve both snapshots.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R07 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1).

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Separate raw and rendered observations before judging final content.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Live JavaScript rendering is not implemented; supplied DOM fixtures are simulations.
Evidence location
raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1)

{'rendered': False, 'raw_noindex': False, 'dom_differs': None, 'rendered_snapshot_ref': None}

Original rule guidance

If needed, authorize controlled rendering with the same network protections and preserve both snapshots.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R07 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1).

Complete saved observation

{
  "dom_differs": null,
  "raw_noindex": false,
  "rendered": false,
  "rendered_snapshot_ref": null
}
R08 Title, headings and languagehttps://northstar.example/guide pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R08 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Only raw title, headings and language were observed; semantic purpose needs owner review.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: title, h1, html[lang]
{'titles': ['How to compare support reporting tools'], 'h1': ['How to compare support reporting tools'], 'lang': 'en-US', 'raw_text_chars': 934, 'possible_js_shell': False}
Inspect the saved observations
Titles
  • How to compare support reporting tools
H1
  • How to compare support reporting tools
Lang
en-US
Raw text chars
934
Possible js shell
No
NEXT ACTION

Confirm page purpose and locate title/H1/language configuration; add an accurate title if missing.

Content editor

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R08 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: title, h1, html[lang].

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
A descriptive title with reviewed headings, language and purpose.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Only raw title, headings and language were observed; semantic purpose needs owner review.
Evidence location
raw_html: title, h1, html[lang]
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: title, h1, html[lang]

{'titles': ['How to compare support reporting tools'], 'h1': ['How to compare support reporting tools'], 'lang': 'en-US', 'raw_text_chars': 934, 'possible_js_shell': False}

Original rule guidance

Confirm page purpose and locate title/H1/language configuration; add an accurate title if missing.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R08 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: title, h1, html[lang].

Complete saved observation

{
  "h1": [
    "How to compare support reporting tools"
  ],
  "lang": "en-US",
  "possible_js_shell": false,
  "raw_text_chars": 934,
  "titles": [
    "How to compare support reporting tools"
  ]
}
R10 Confirmed business factshttps://northstar.example/guide needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R10 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Only a whole conflicting statement with explicitly user-confirmed context is a failure; phrases, negation and missing expected wording need review.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts
[]
Inspect the saved observations None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Verify the business source/date, reconcile the quoted conflicting phrase and review context.

Business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R10 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Literal page claims agree with user-confirmed business facts.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Only a whole conflicting statement with explicitly user-confirmed context is a failure; phrases, negation and missing expected wording need review.
Evidence location
raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts

[]

Original rule guidance

Verify the business source/date, reconcile the quoted conflicting phrase and review context.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R10 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts.

Complete saved observation

[]
R12 Selected claims and sourceshttps://northstar.example/guide not applicable
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R12 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Attribution and source quality require human review. No claim inventory was inferred.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims
[]
Inspect the saved observations None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Locate each selected claim's original source, date and surrounding context; confirm it with the content owner.

Content editor

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R12 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Selected claims have verified original sources, dates and context.
Applicability
not applicable
Severity basis
Attribution and source quality require human review. No claim inventory was inferred.
Evidence location
raw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims

[]

Original rule guidance

Locate each selected claim's original source, date and surrounding context; confirm it with the content owner.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R12 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text offsets; user_selected_claims.

Complete saved observation

[]
R03 Robots acquisition and policysite:northstar.example pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R03 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Audit, search and training user agents are separate. Disallow can be intentional.

SOURCE EXCERPTsnapshots: each page.robots
[{'page': 'https://northstar.example/product', 'robots': {'status': 'fetched', 'allowed': True, 'user_agent': 'EvidenceAuditBot', 'body': 'User-agent: *\nAllow: /\n'}}, {'page': 'https://northstar.example/implementation', 'robots': {'status': 'fetched', 'allowed': True, 'user_agent': 'EvidenceAuditBot', 'body': 'User-agent: *\nAllow: /\n'}}, {'page': 'https://northstar.example/guide', 'robots': {'status': 'fetched', 'allowed': True, 'user_agent': 'EvidenceAuditBot', 'body': 'User-agent: *\nAllow
Inspect the saved observations
  • Page
    https://northstar.example/product
    Robots
    Inspect 4 saved fields
    Status
    fetched
    Allowed
    Yes
    User agent
    EvidenceAuditBot
    Body
    User-agent: * Allow: /
  • Page
    https://northstar.example/implementation
    Robots
    Inspect 4 saved fields
    Status
    fetched
    Allowed
    Yes
    User agent
    EvidenceAuditBot
    Body
    User-agent: * Allow: /
  • Page
    https://northstar.example/guide
    Robots
    Inspect 4 saved fields
    Status
    fetched
    Allowed
    Yes
    User agent
    EvidenceAuditBot
    Body
    User-agent: * Allow: /
NEXT ACTION

Confirm intended bot policies; re-fetch robots and test each selected path for the exact user agent.

SEO owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R03 v1.0.0; inspect snapshots: each page.robots.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
site:northstar.example
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Robots policy is observed for each selected path and named user agent.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Audit, search and training user agents are separate. Disallow can be intentional.
Evidence location
snapshots: each page.robots
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗
sample-product.json ↗
sample-implementation.json ↗
sample-guide.json ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

snapshots: each page.robots

[{'page': 'https://northstar.example/product', 'robots': {'status': 'fetched', 'allowed': True, 'user_agent': 'EvidenceAuditBot', 'body': 'User-agent: *\nAllow: /\n'}}, {'page': 'https://northstar.example/implementation', 'robots': {'status': 'fetched', 'allowed': True, 'user_agent': 'EvidenceAuditBot', 'body': 'User-agent: *\nAllow: /\n'}}, {'page': 'https://northstar.example/guide', 'robots': {'status': 'fetched', 'allowed': True, 'user_agent': 'EvidenceAuditBot', 'body': 'User-agent: *\nAllow

Original rule guidance

Confirm intended bot policies; re-fetch robots and test each selected path for the exact user agent.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R03 v1.0.0; inspect snapshots: each page.robots.

Complete saved observation

[
  {
    "page": "https://northstar.example/product",
    "robots": {
      "allowed": true,
      "body": "User-agent: *\nAllow: /\n",
      "status": "fetched",
      "user_agent": "EvidenceAuditBot"
    }
  },
  {
    "page": "https://northstar.example/implementation",
    "robots": {
      "allowed": true,
      "body": "User-agent: *\nAllow: /\n",
      "status": "fetched",
      "user_agent": "EvidenceAuditBot"
    }
  },
  {
    "page": "https://northstar.example/guide",
    "robots": {
      "allowed": true,
      "body": "User-agent: *\nAllow: /\n",
      "status": "fetched",
      "user_agent": "EvidenceAuditBot"
    }
  }
]
R09 Links within the selected scopesite:northstar.example pass
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R09 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

No link in this selected scope does not establish a site-wide orphan.

SOURCE EXCERPTraw_html: a[href] across selected page snapshots
{'selected_urls': ['https://northstar.example/guide', 'https://northstar.example/implementation', 'https://northstar.example/product'], 'observed_links': [{'from': 'https://northstar.example/product', 'to': 'https://northstar.example/implementation'}, {'from': 'https://northstar.example/product', 'to': 'https://northstar.example/guide'}, {'from': 'https://northstar.example/implementation', 'to': 'https://northstar.example/product'}, {'from': 'https://northstar.example/guide', 'to': 'https://nort
Inspect the saved observations
Selected urls
  • https://northstar.example/guide
  • https://northstar.example/implementation
  • https://northstar.example/product
Observed links
  • From
    https://northstar.example/product
    To
    https://northstar.example/implementation
  • From
    https://northstar.example/product
    To
    https://northstar.example/guide
  • From
    https://northstar.example/implementation
    To
    https://northstar.example/product
  • From
    https://northstar.example/guide
    To
    https://northstar.example/product
  • From
    https://northstar.example/guide
    To
    https://northstar.example/implementation
No observed incoming link
None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Review navigation intent and add contextual links only where useful; re-check the same selected pages.

Content editor

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R09 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: a[href] across selected page snapshots.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
site:northstar.example
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Selected-page links support the intended navigation.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
No link in this selected scope does not establish a site-wide orphan.
Evidence location
raw_html: a[href] across selected page snapshots
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗
sample-product.json ↗
sample-implementation.json ↗
sample-guide.json ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

raw_html: a[href] across selected page snapshots

{'selected_urls': ['https://northstar.example/guide', 'https://northstar.example/implementation', 'https://northstar.example/product'], 'observed_links': [{'from': 'https://northstar.example/product', 'to': 'https://northstar.example/implementation'}, {'from': 'https://northstar.example/product', 'to': 'https://northstar.example/guide'}, {'from': 'https://northstar.example/implementation', 'to': 'https://northstar.example/product'}, {'from': 'https://northstar.example/guide', 'to': 'https://nort

Original rule guidance

Review navigation intent and add contextual links only where useful; re-check the same selected pages.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R09 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: a[href] across selected page snapshots.

Complete saved observation

{
  "no_observed_incoming_link": [],
  "observed_links": [
    {
      "from": "https://northstar.example/product",
      "to": "https://northstar.example/implementation"
    },
    {
      "from": "https://northstar.example/product",
      "to": "https://northstar.example/guide"
    },
    {
      "from": "https://northstar.example/implementation",
      "to": "https://northstar.example/product"
    },
    {
      "from": "https://northstar.example/guide",
      "to": "https://northstar.example/product"
    },
    {
      "from": "https://northstar.example/guide",
      "to": "https://northstar.example/implementation"
    }
  ],
  "selected_urls": [
    "https://northstar.example/guide",
    "https://northstar.example/implementation",
    "https://northstar.example/product"
  ]
}
R11 Sitemap and auxiliary filessite:northstar.example unknown
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · R11 v1.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Only /sitemap.xml and /llms.txt were attempted. Missing llms.txt is not Google AI eligibility failure.

SOURCE EXCERPTauxiliary snapshots: response status and parsed XML
[]
Inspect the saved observations None recorded in this field
NEXT ACTION

Locate the site's actual sitemap if elsewhere; repair only observed XML errors; do not infer indexation.

Developer

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R11 v1.0.0; inspect auxiliary snapshots: response status and parsed XML.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
site:northstar.example
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Selected auxiliary files have an observed acquisition and parse state.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Only /sitemap.xml and /llms.txt were attempted. Missing llms.txt is not Google AI eligibility failure.
Evidence location
auxiliary snapshots: response status and parsed XML
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

auxiliary snapshots: response status and parsed XML

[]

Original rule guidance

Locate the site's actual sitemap if elsewhere; repair only observed XML errors; do not infer indexation.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R11 v1.0.0; inspect auxiliary snapshots: response status and parsed XML.

Complete saved observation

[]
04 / CONTENT EVIDENCE REVIEW

Look beyond the tags.

25 observations

Review page purpose, decision support, claims, context, and consistency. Structural observations are automated. Meaning, authority, and business truth need human judgment.

Explore the content evidence map By review dimension
Inspect content observations 25 saved findings
C01 Purpose and audiencehttps://northstar.example/product needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C01 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Observed 5 retained headings and 2 action labels. Page purpose and audience are user-confirmed, but wording alignment still needs review.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)
Northstar workspace for support teams
Inspect the saved observations
Context
Page type
product
Audience
US support team operations managers
Purpose
Compare a suitable workspace plan
Primary action
Request a plan review
Questions
Inspect 3 saved items
  • Which plan fits my team?
  • What preparation and limits apply?
  • What supports the review-speed claim?
Business context
Fictional owner confirms that Starter and Team, assisted and self-serve, and US and UK are different offers. Historical prices must retain their dates.
Confirmed
Yes
Source status
confirmed_user
Truncated
No
Observed titles
None recorded in this field
Observed heading outline
  • Text
    Northstar workspace for support teams
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Northstar workspace for support teams Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • US
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    1
  • Text
    What the workspace does
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture. What the workspace does Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • US
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
  • Text
    Plan options
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h4:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner. Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Plan
    • Starter
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • UK
    • United States
    Condition
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • per
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    4
  • Text
    Evidence behind our claims
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)
    Context
    A fictional reviewer wrote: "We resolved 50% more issues during one trial." This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result. Evidence behind our claims Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • not
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    Yes
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
  • Text
    Before you choose
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)
    Context
    Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here. Before you choose All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • not
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
Type candidates
None recorded in this field
Action candidates
  • Text
    Request a plan review
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    This makes it easier. It works with the process above. Request a plan review
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Href
    https://northstar.example/contact
    Basis
    Literal action wording; intended primary action not established
  • Text
    Contact Northstar
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > footer:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(2)
    Context
    Privacy Contact Northstar
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    footer
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Href
    mailto:help@northstar.example
    Basis
    Literal action wording; intended primary action not established
Semantic alignment
not_automatically_determined
Locate all 8 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/product

Northstar workspace for support teams

Context: Northstar workspace for support teams Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 2 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/product

What the workspace does

Context: Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture. What the workspace does Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 3 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h4:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/product

Plan options

Context: Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner. Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 4 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/product

Evidence behind our claims

Context: A fictional reviewer wrote: "We resolved 50% more issues during one trial." This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result. Evidence behind our claims Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 5 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)

https://northstar.example/product

Before you choose

Context: Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here. Before you choose All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 6 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/product

Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture.

Context: Northstar workspace for support teams Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture. What the workspace does

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 7 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/product

Request a plan review

Context: This makes it easier. It works with the process above. Request a plan review

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 8 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > footer:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/product

Contact Northstar

Context: Privacy Contact Northstar

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Who should use this specific page, and what should they be able to do after reading it?
  • Do the cited title, introduction and action communicate the same intended task?
NEXT ACTION

Confirm the intended visitor, page type and task, then compare the title, opening passage and primary action to that brief; revise only an observed mismatch.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-run C01 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Observed 5 retained headings and 2 action labels. Page purpose and audience are user-confirmed, but wording alignment still needs review.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h4:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h4:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)

Northstar workspace for support teams

Original rule guidance

Confirm the intended visitor, page type and task, then compare the title, opening passage and primary action to that brief; revise only an observed mismatch.

Re-run C01 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "action_candidates": [
    {
      "area": "main",
      "basis": "Literal action wording; intended primary action not established",
      "context": "This makes it easier. It works with the process above. Request a plan review",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "href": "https://northstar.example/contact",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e a:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "Request a plan review",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "footer",
      "basis": "Literal action wording; intended primary action not established",
      "context": "Privacy Contact Northstar",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "href": "mailto:help@northstar.example",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e footer:nth-of-type(1) \u003e a:nth-of-type(2)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "Contact Northstar",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "context": {
    "audience": "US support team operations managers",
    "business_context": "Fictional owner confirms that Starter and Team, assisted and self-serve, and US and UK are different offers. Historical prices must retain their dates.",
    "confirmed": true,
    "page_type": "product",
    "primary_action": "Request a plan review",
    "purpose": "Compare a suitable workspace plan",
    "questions": [
      "Which plan fits my team?",
      "What preparation and limits apply?",
      "What supports the review-speed claim?"
    ],
    "source_status": "confirmed_user",
    "truncated": false
  },
  "observed_heading_outline": [
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "Northstar workspace for support teams Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": [
          "US"
        ]
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "level": 1,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h1:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Northstar workspace for support teams",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture. What the workspace does Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": [
          "US"
        ]
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "level": 2,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h2:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "What the workspace does",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner. Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [
          "per"
        ],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "Plan",
          "Starter",
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": [
          "UK",
          "United States"
        ]
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "level": 4,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h4:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Plan options",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "A fictional reviewer wrote: \"We resolved 50% more issues during one trial.\" This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result. Evidence behind our claims Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [
          "not"
        ],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": true,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "level": 2,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h2:nth-of-type(2)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Evidence behind our claims",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here. Before you choose All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [
          "not"
        ],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "level": 2,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h2:nth-of-type(3)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Before you choose",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "observed_titles": [],
  "semantic_alignment": "not_automatically_determined",
  "type_candidates": []
}
C02 Questions and answer evidencehttps://northstar.example/product needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C02 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

3 owner-confirmed questions have passage candidates for review; answer completeness has not been determined.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4)
The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
Question-to-passage map 3 confirmed questions

Literal overlap retrieves candidates only. Heading text alone is not a verified answer, and no candidate does not prove the page lacks an answer.

  1. Which plan fits my team?

    3 retained candidate(s) · Answer status: needs review

    PASSAGE CANDIDATE · NOT VERIFIEDhtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4)
    The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
    PASSAGE CANDIDATE · NOT VERIFIEDhtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)
    Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner.
    PASSAGE CANDIDATE · NOT VERIFIEDhtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)
    The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
  2. What preparation and limits apply?

    0 retained candidate(s) · Answer status: needs review

    No literal-overlap candidate was retrieved in the retained inventory. Review the saved page before deciding whether there is a content gap.

  3. What supports the review-speed claim?

    0 retained candidate(s) · Answer status: needs review

    No literal-overlap candidate was retrieved in the retained inventory. Review the saved page before deciding whether there is a content gap.

Inspect the saved observations
Confirmed question count
3
Question checks
  • Question
    Which plan fits my team?
    Source status
    confirmed_user
    Answer status
    needs_review
    Verbatim question observed
    No
    Candidate passages
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Text
      The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4)
      Context
      The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.
      Text truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Area
      main
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • no
      Historical
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • 2024
      • historical
      Package
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • Starter
      • plan
      Region
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • UK
      • United States
      Condition
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • per
      Quotation
      No
      Source status
      observed
      Retained word count
      12
      Matching words
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • plan
      • team
      Retrieval method
      literal_word_overlap_not_answer_validation
    • Text
      Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner.
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)
      Context
      What the workspace does Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner. Plan options
      Text truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Area
      main
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Historical
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Package
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • Plan
      Region
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Condition
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Quotation
      No
      Source status
      observed
      Retained word count
      20
      Matching words
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • team
      Retrieval method
      literal_word_overlap_not_answer_validation
    • Text
      The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)
      Context
      Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
      Text truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Area
      main
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Historical
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Package
      Inspect 3 saved items
      • Plan
      • Starter
      • plan
      Region
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • UK
      • United States
      Condition
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • per
      Quotation
      No
      Source status
      observed
      Retained word count
      23
      Matching words
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • plan
      Retrieval method
      literal_word_overlap_not_answer_validation
    Meaning
    Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.
  • Question
    What preparation and limits apply?
    Source status
    confirmed_user
    Answer status
    needs_review
    Verbatim question observed
    No
    Candidate passages
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Meaning
    Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.
  • Question
    What supports the review-speed claim?
    Source status
    confirmed_user
    Answer status
    needs_review
    Verbatim question observed
    No
    Candidate passages
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Meaning
    Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.
Unconfirmed questions retained
None recorded in this field
Coverage
Not obtained
Requirements
No universal price, FAQ or word-count requirement is applied.
Locate all 3 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C02html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4)

https://northstar.example/product

The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.

Context: The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 2 · C02html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/product

Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner.

Context: What the workspace does Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner. Plan options

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 3 · C02html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)

https://northstar.example/product

The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.

Context: Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Does each retrieved passage answer the full question, including relevant conditions?
  • Which important question is confirmed by the owner but still needs a verified answer?
NEXT ACTION

For each confirmed question, identify the exact answer passage, its supporting facts and necessary conditions; add content only after the owner confirms a real gap.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

For every confirmed question, record the complete answer, necessary conditions and support, or an owner-confirmed gap to address.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
3 owner-confirmed questions have passage candidates for review; answer completeness has not been determined.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)

The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.

Original rule guidance

For each confirmed question, identify the exact answer passage, its supporting facts and necessary conditions; add content only after the owner confirms a real gap.

Re-run C02 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "confirmed_question_count": 3,
  "coverage": null,
  "question_checks": [
    {
      "answer_status": "needs_review",
      "candidate_passages": [
        {
          "area": "main",
          "context": "The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [
              "per"
            ],
            "historical": [
              "2024",
              "historical"
            ],
            "negation": [
              "no"
            ],
            "package": [
              "Starter",
              "plan"
            ],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": [
              "UK",
              "United States"
            ]
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "matching_words": [
            "plan",
            "team"
          ],
          "retained_word_count": 12,
          "retrieval_method": "literal_word_overlap_not_answer_validation",
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(4)",
          "source_status": "observed",
          "text": "The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.",
          "text_truncated": false
        },
        {
          "area": "main",
          "context": "What the workspace does Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner. Plan options",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [],
            "historical": [],
            "negation": [],
            "package": [
              "Plan"
            ],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": []
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "matching_words": [
            "team"
          ],
          "retained_word_count": 20,
          "retrieval_method": "literal_word_overlap_not_answer_validation",
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(2)",
          "source_status": "observed",
          "text": "Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner.",
          "text_truncated": false
        },
        {
          "area": "main",
          "context": "Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [
              "per"
            ],
            "historical": [],
            "negation": [],
            "package": [
              "Plan",
              "Starter",
              "plan"
            ],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": [
              "UK",
              "United States"
            ]
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "matching_words": [
            "plan"
          ],
          "retained_word_count": 23,
          "retrieval_method": "literal_word_overlap_not_answer_validation",
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(3)",
          "source_status": "observed",
          "text": "The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.",
          "text_truncated": false
        }
      ],
      "meaning": "Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.",
      "question": "Which plan fits my team?",
      "source_status": "confirmed_user",
      "verbatim_question_observed": false
    },
    {
      "answer_status": "needs_review",
      "candidate_passages": [],
      "meaning": "Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.",
      "question": "What preparation and limits apply?",
      "source_status": "confirmed_user",
      "verbatim_question_observed": false
    },
    {
      "answer_status": "needs_review",
      "candidate_passages": [],
      "meaning": "Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.",
      "question": "What supports the review-speed claim?",
      "source_status": "confirmed_user",
      "verbatim_question_observed": false
    }
  ],
  "requirements": "No universal price, FAQ or word-count requirement is applied.",
  "unconfirmed_questions_retained": []
}
C03 Organization and clarityhttps://northstar.example/product needs review
P2 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C03 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Observed 1 forward heading-level jumps and 0 exact repeated paragraph groups in retained text. Neither establishes poor content without context.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)
What the workspace does
Inspect the saved observations
Heading jumps
  • From
    Inspect 9 saved fields
    Text
    What the workspace does
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture. What the workspace does Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • US
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
    To
    Inspect 9 saved fields
    Text
    Plan options
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h4:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner. Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Plan
    • Starter
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • UK
    • United States
    Condition
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • per
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    4
Exact repeated paragraphs
None recorded in this field
Stock phrase candidates
None recorded in this field
Acronym candidates
None recorded in this field
Descriptive counts
Raw text sample words
230
Dates
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
1
Retained
1
Truncated
No
Links
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
6
Retained
6
Truncated
No
Headings
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
5
Retained
5
Truncated
No
Paragraphs
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
11
Retained
11
Truncated
No
Tables
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
1
Retained
1
Truncated
No
Actions
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
2
Retained
2
Truncated
No
Entity candidates
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
7
Retained
7
Truncated
No
Claim candidates
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
3
Retained
3
Truncated
No
Retained paragraph words
194
Quality by length
not_inferred
Locate all 3 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C03html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h4:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/product

Plan options

Context: Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner. Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 2 · C03html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/product

Northstar workspace for support teams

Context: Northstar workspace for support teams Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 3 · C03html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/product

What the workspace does

Context: Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture. What the workspace does Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Do heading levels reflect actual section relationships?
  • Is each repeated passage intentional and useful here?
  • Will this audience understand the cited acronyms and general wording?

Business information needed

  • Audience familiarity and reason for intentional repeated content
NEXT ACTION

Compare the cited headings with their section relationship. Change the level only if it misrepresents that relationship. For repeated text, document its purpose; remove or consolidate only unnecessary repetition.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

The editor records a decision for each cited transition/reuse. Re-extraction matches the intended outline and any retained repetition has an explanation.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Observed 1 forward heading-level jumps and 0 exact repeated paragraph groups in retained text. Neither establishes poor content without context.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h4:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h4:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)

Plan options

Original rule guidance

Review the listed heading transitions and repeated passages; retain intentional policy/boilerplate reuse. Replace a flagged stock phrase only with a more specific supported explanation.

Re-run C03 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "acronym_candidates": [],
  "descriptive_counts": {
    "actions": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 2,
      "retained": 2,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "claim_candidates": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 3,
      "retained": 3,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "dates": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 1,
      "retained": 1,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "entity_candidates": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 7,
      "retained": 7,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "headings": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 5,
      "retained": 5,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "links": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 6,
      "retained": 6,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "paragraphs": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 11,
      "retained": 11,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "raw_text_sample_words": 230,
    "retained_paragraph_words": 194,
    "tables": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 1,
      "retained": 1,
      "truncated": false
    }
  },
  "exact_repeated_paragraphs": [],
  "heading_jumps": [
    {
      "from": {
        "area": "main",
        "context": "Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture. What the workspace does Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner.",
        "context_cues": {
          "condition": [],
          "historical": [],
          "negation": [],
          "package": [],
          "quotation": false,
          "region": [
            "US"
          ]
        },
        "context_truncated": false,
        "level": 2,
        "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h2:nth-of-type(1)",
        "source_status": "observed",
        "text": "What the workspace does",
        "text_truncated": false
      },
      "to": {
        "area": "main",
        "context": "Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner. Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.",
        "context_cues": {
          "condition": [
            "per"
          ],
          "historical": [],
          "negation": [],
          "package": [
            "Plan",
            "Starter",
            "plan"
          ],
          "quotation": false,
          "region": [
            "UK",
            "United States"
          ]
        },
        "context_truncated": false,
        "level": 4,
        "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h4:nth-of-type(1)",
        "source_status": "observed",
        "text": "Plan options",
        "text_truncated": false
      }
    }
  ],
  "quality_by_length": "not_inferred",
  "stock_phrase_candidates": []
}
C04 Entities and factual contexthttps://northstar.example/product needs review
P2 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C04 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Retained 7 entity/fact candidates and 1 currency groups with differing amounts. These are comparison candidates, not confirmed business conflicts.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)
Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture.
Inspect the saved observations
Literal entity candidates
  • Text
    Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Northstar workspace for support teams Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture. What the workspace does
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • US
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Nearby links
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Url
      https://example.com/
      Label
      Source link
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/contact
      Label
      Request a plan review
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    Kind
    region
    Literal
    US
  • Text
    The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)
    Context
    Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Plan
    • Starter
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • UK
    • United States
    Condition
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • per
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Nearby links
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Url
      https://example.com/
      Label
      Source link
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/contact
      Label
      Request a plan review
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    Kind
    price
    Literal
    USD 39
    Currency
    USD
    Additional fields
    2 more in the complete saved data below.
  • Text
    The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)
    Context
    Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Plan
    • Starter
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • UK
    • United States
    Condition
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • per
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Nearby links
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Url
      https://example.com/
      Label
      Source link
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/contact
      Label
      Request a plan review
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    Kind
    price
    Literal
    GBP 35
    Currency
    GBP
    Additional fields
    2 more in the complete saved data below.
  • Text
    The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)
    Context
    Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Plan
    • Starter
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • UK
    • United States
    Condition
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • per
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Nearby links
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Url
      https://example.com/
      Label
      Source link
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/contact
      Label
      Request a plan review
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    Kind
    region
    Literal
    United States
  • Text
    The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)
    Context
    Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Plan
    • Starter
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • UK
    • United States
    Condition
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • per
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Nearby links
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Url
      https://example.com/
      Label
      Source link
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/contact
      Label
      Request a plan review
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    Kind
    region
    Literal
    UK
  • Text
    The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4)
    Context
    The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • no
    Historical
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • 2024
    • historical
    Package
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Starter
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • UK
    • United States
    Condition
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • per
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Nearby links
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Url
      https://example.com/
      Label
      Source link
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/contact
      Label
      Request a plan review
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    Kind
    price
    Literal
    USD 79
    Currency
    USD
    Additional fields
    2 more in the complete saved data below.
  • Text
    In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)
    Context
    The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available. We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • no
    • not
    Historical
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • 2024
    • historical
    Package
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Starter
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • per
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Nearby links
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Url
      https://example.com/
      Label
      Source link
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/contact
      Label
      Request a plan review
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    Kind
    price
    Literal
    USD 29
    Currency
    USD
    Additional fields
    2 more in the complete saved data below.
Same currency different amounts
  • Currency
    USD
    Values
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Text
      The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)
      Context
      Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
      Text truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Area
      main
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Historical
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Package
      Inspect 3 saved items
      • Plan
      • Starter
      • plan
      Region
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • UK
      • United States
      Condition
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • per
      Quotation
      No
      Source status
      inferred
      Nearby links
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • Url
        https://example.com/
        Label
        Source link
        Relationship
        same_container_support_unverified
      • Url
        https://northstar.example/contact
        Label
        Request a plan review
        Relationship
        same_container_support_unverified
      Kind
      price
      Literal
      USD 39
      Currency
      USD
      Additional fields
      2 more in the complete saved data below.
    • Text
      The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4)
      Context
      The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.
      Text truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Area
      main
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • no
      Historical
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • 2024
      • historical
      Package
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • Starter
      • plan
      Region
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • UK
      • United States
      Condition
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • per
      Quotation
      No
      Source status
      inferred
      Nearby links
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • Url
        https://example.com/
        Label
        Source link
        Relationship
        same_container_support_unverified
      • Url
        https://northstar.example/contact
        Label
        Request a plan review
        Relationship
        same_container_support_unverified
      Kind
      price
      Literal
      USD 79
      Currency
      USD
      Additional fields
      2 more in the complete saved data below.
    • Text
      In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)
      Context
      The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available. We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.
      Text truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Area
      main
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • no
      • not
      Historical
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • 2024
      • historical
      Package
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • Starter
      • plan
      Region
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Condition
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • per
      Quotation
      No
      Source status
      inferred
      Nearby links
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • Url
        https://example.com/
        Label
        Source link
        Relationship
        same_container_support_unverified
      • Url
        https://northstar.example/contact
        Label
        Request a plan review
        Relationship
        same_container_support_unverified
      Kind
      price
      Literal
      USD 29
      Currency
      USD
      Additional fields
      2 more in the complete saved data below.
    Interpretation
    Different literal amounts; same product, tier, period and region have not been established.
User business context
Fictional owner confirms that Starter and Team, assisted and self-serve, and US and UK are different offers. Historical prices must retain their dates.
Business context status
confirmed_user
Semantic conflicts
not_automatically_determined
Locate all 4 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C04html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/product

Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture.

Context: Northstar workspace for support teams Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture. What the workspace does

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 2 · C04html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)

https://northstar.example/product

The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.

Context: Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 3 · C04html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4)

https://northstar.example/product

The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.

Context: The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 4 · C04html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)

https://northstar.example/product

In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.

Context: The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available. We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Do these statements describe the same product, plan, region and effective date?
  • Is a highlighted amount historical, quoted, conditional or negated?
  • What authoritative business record establishes the correct statement?

Business information needed

  • Dated authoritative offer/specification/policy facts and applicable region or package
NEXT ACTION

For each cited amount, record product/variant, package, region and effective date. Compare only matching offers with the owner's dated price record; correct or qualify text only after confirming a mismatch.

Business owner / content editor

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Each compared statement has an offer/region/date label and an authoritative record; any verified conflict is corrected, or the legitimate difference is documented.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Retained 7 entity/fact candidates and 1 currency groups with differing amounts. These are comparison candidates, not confirmed business conflicts.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)

Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture.

Original rule guidance

Ask the owner to verify the cited amount, specification, delivery and region statements against dated authoritative facts. Compare the same offer and conditions; preserve quotation, negation, historical and package context.

Re-run C04 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "business_context_status": "confirmed_user",
  "literal_entity_candidates": [
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "Northstar workspace for support teams Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture. What the workspace does",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": [
          "US"
        ]
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "kind": "region",
      "literal": "US",
      "nearby_links": [
        {
          "label": "Source link",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://example.com/"
        },
        {
          "label": "Request a plan review",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/contact"
        }
      ],
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture.",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "amount": "39",
      "area": "main",
      "context": "Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [
          "per"
        ],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "Plan",
          "Starter",
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": [
          "UK",
          "United States"
        ]
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "currency": "USD",
      "currency_symbol": "",
      "kind": "price",
      "literal": "USD 39",
      "nearby_links": [
        {
          "label": "Source link",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://example.com/"
        },
        {
          "label": "Request a plan review",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/contact"
        }
      ],
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(3)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "amount": "35",
      "area": "main",
      "context": "Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [
          "per"
        ],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "Plan",
          "Starter",
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": [
          "UK",
          "United States"
        ]
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "currency": "GBP",
      "currency_symbol": "",
      "kind": "price",
      "literal": "GBP 35",
      "nearby_links": [
        {
          "label": "Source link",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://example.com/"
        },
        {
          "label": "Request a plan review",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/contact"
        }
      ],
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(3)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [
          "per"
        ],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "Plan",
          "Starter",
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": [
          "UK",
          "United States"
        ]
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "kind": "region",
      "literal": "United States",
      "nearby_links": [
        {
          "label": "Source link",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://example.com/"
        },
        {
          "label": "Request a plan review",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/contact"
        }
      ],
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(3)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [
          "per"
        ],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "Plan",
          "Starter",
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": [
          "UK",
          "United States"
        ]
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "kind": "region",
      "literal": "UK",
      "nearby_links": [
        {
          "label": "Source link",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://example.com/"
        },
        {
          "label": "Request a plan review",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/contact"
        }
      ],
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(3)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "amount": "79",
      "area": "main",
      "context": "The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [
          "per"
        ],
        "historical": [
          "2024",
          "historical"
        ],
        "negation": [
          "no"
        ],
        "package": [
          "Starter",
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": [
          "UK",
          "United States"
        ]
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "currency": "USD",
      "currency_symbol": "",
      "kind": "price",
      "literal": "USD 79",
      "nearby_links": [
        {
          "label": "Source link",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://example.com/"
        },
        {
          "label": "Request a plan review",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/contact"
        }
      ],
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(4)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "amount": "29",
      "area": "main",
      "context": "The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available. We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [
          "per"
        ],
        "historical": [
          "2024",
          "historical"
        ],
        "negation": [
          "no",
          "not"
        ],
        "package": [
          "Starter",
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "currency": "USD",
      "currency_symbol": "",
      "kind": "price",
      "literal": "USD 29",
      "nearby_links": [
        {
          "label": "Source link",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://example.com/"
        },
        {
          "label": "Request a plan review",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/contact"
        }
      ],
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(5)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "same_currency_different_amounts": [
    {
      "currency": "USD",
      "interpretation": "Different literal amounts; same product, tier, period and region have not been established.",
      "values": [
        {
          "amount": "39",
          "area": "main",
          "context": "Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [
              "per"
            ],
            "historical": [],
            "negation": [],
            "package": [
              "Plan",
              "Starter",
              "plan"
            ],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": [
              "UK",
              "United States"
            ]
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "currency": "USD",
          "currency_symbol": "",
          "kind": "price",
          "literal": "USD 39",
          "nearby_links": [
            {
              "label": "Source link",
              "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
              "url": "https://example.com/"
            },
            {
              "label": "Request a plan review",
              "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
              "url": "https://northstar.example/contact"
            }
          ],
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(3)",
          "source_status": "inferred",
          "text": "The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.",
          "text_truncated": false
        },
        {
          "amount": "79",
          "area": "main",
          "context": "The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [
              "per"
            ],
            "historical": [
              "2024",
              "historical"
            ],
            "negation": [
              "no"
            ],
            "package": [
              "Starter",
              "plan"
            ],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": [
              "UK",
              "United States"
            ]
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "currency": "USD",
          "currency_symbol": "",
          "kind": "price",
          "literal": "USD 79",
          "nearby_links": [
            {
              "label": "Source link",
              "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
              "url": "https://example.com/"
            },
            {
              "label": "Request a plan review",
              "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
              "url": "https://northstar.example/contact"
            }
          ],
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(4)",
          "source_status": "inferred",
          "text": "The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.",
          "text_truncated": false
        },
        {
          "amount": "29",
          "area": "main",
          "context": "The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available. We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [
              "per"
            ],
            "historical": [
              "2024",
              "historical"
            ],
            "negation": [
              "no",
              "not"
            ],
            "package": [
              "Starter",
              "plan"
            ],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": []
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "currency": "USD",
          "currency_symbol": "",
          "kind": "price",
          "literal": "USD 29",
          "nearby_links": [
            {
              "label": "Source link",
              "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
              "url": "https://example.com/"
            },
            {
              "label": "Request a plan review",
              "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
              "url": "https://northstar.example/contact"
            }
          ],
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(5)",
          "source_status": "inferred",
          "text": "In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.",
          "text_truncated": false
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "semantic_conflicts": "not_automatically_determined",
  "user_business_context": "Fictional owner confirms that Starter and Team, assisted and self-serve, and US and UK are different offers. Historical prices must retain their dates."
}
C05 Claims and source supporthttps://northstar.example/product needs review
P2 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C05 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Retained 3 numerical/performance/comparison claim candidates; source support remains unknown for all of them.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(6)
We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.
Inspect the saved observations
Claim candidates
  • Text
    We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(6)
    Context
    In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available. We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time. A fictional reviewer wrote: "We resolved 50% more issues during one trial." This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • no
    • not
    Historical
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • 2024
    • historical
    Package
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Starter
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • per
    Quotation
    Yes
    Source status
    inferred
    Nearby links
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Url
      https://example.com/
      Label
      Source link
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/contact
      Label
      Request a plan review
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    Candidate signals
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • 50%
    • guarantee
    Source support
    unknown
    Source dates
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
  • Text
    A fictional reviewer wrote: "We resolved 50% more issues during one trial." This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > blockquote:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    A fictional reviewer wrote: "We resolved 50% more issues during one trial." This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • not
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    Yes
    Source status
    inferred
    Nearby links
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Candidate signals
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • 50%
    Source support
    unknown
    Source dates
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
  • Text
    Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(7)
    Context
    Evidence behind our claims Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here. Before you choose
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • not
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Nearby links
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • Url
      https://example.com/
      Label
      Source link
      Relationship
      same_block_support_unverified
    Candidate signals
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • 42%
    Source support
    unknown
    Source dates
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
Candidate count
3
Source support unknown
3
Links fetched
0
Meaning
Nearby links, numbers and author names do not verify a claim. Candidate extraction is non-exhaustive.
Locate all 3 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C05html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(6)

https://northstar.example/product

We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.

Context: In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available. We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time. A fictional reviewer wrote: "We resolved 50% more issues during one trial." This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 2 · C05html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > blockquote:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/product

A fictional reviewer wrote: "We resolved 50% more issues during one trial." This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result.

Context: A fictional reviewer wrote: "We resolved 50% more issues during one trial." This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 3 · C05html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(7)

https://northstar.example/product

Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here.

Context: Evidence behind our claims Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here. Before you choose

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Does the linked original source support this exact wording?
  • What date, population, conditions or method limits the claim?
  • Is this the site's claim, a quotation, a denial or a historical example?

Business information needed

  • Original supporting source, exact passage, date, method and claim ownership
NEXT ACTION

Open the cited passage in context. Identify claim ownership, then record the original source and exact supporting passage, date, method and conditions. Qualify or remove the claim only if that review establishes a problem.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

The reviewer records a support decision, source passage and applicable conditions for each candidate. Unsupported wording is corrected with owner approval.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Retained 3 numerical/performance/comparison claim candidates; source support remains unknown for all of them.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(6); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > blockquote:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(7)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(6); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > blockquote:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(7)

We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.

Original rule guidance

For each cited candidate, locate the original source and exact supporting passage, confirm date/method and scope, then retain, qualify or correct the claim using verified evidence.

Re-run C05 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "candidate_count": 3,
  "claim_candidates": [
    {
      "area": "main",
      "candidate_signals": [
        "50%",
        "guarantee"
      ],
      "context": "In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available. We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time. A fictional reviewer wrote: \"We resolved 50% more issues during one trial.\" This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [
          "per"
        ],
        "historical": [
          "2024",
          "historical"
        ],
        "negation": [
          "no",
          "not"
        ],
        "package": [
          "Starter",
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": true,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "nearby_links": [
        {
          "label": "Source link",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://example.com/"
        },
        {
          "label": "Request a plan review",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/contact"
        }
      ],
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(6)",
      "source_dates": [],
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "source_support": "unknown",
      "text": "We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "main",
      "candidate_signals": [
        "50%"
      ],
      "context": "A fictional reviewer wrote: \"We resolved 50% more issues during one trial.\" This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [
          "not"
        ],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": true,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "nearby_links": [],
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e blockquote:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_dates": [],
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "source_support": "unknown",
      "text": "A fictional reviewer wrote: \"We resolved 50% more issues during one trial.\" This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result.",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "main",
      "candidate_signals": [
        "42%"
      ],
      "context": "Evidence behind our claims Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here. Before you choose",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [
          "not"
        ],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "nearby_links": [
        {
          "label": "Source link",
          "relationship": "same_block_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://example.com/"
        }
      ],
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(7)",
      "source_dates": [],
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "source_support": "unknown",
      "text": "Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here.",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "links_fetched": 0,
  "meaning": "Nearby links, numbers and author names do not verify a claim. Candidate extraction is non-exhaustive.",
  "source_support_unknown": 3
}
C06 Extractable structurehttps://northstar.example/product needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C06 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Observed 0 lists, 0 definition terms and 1 tables; 1 tables have no retained th labels. Standalone clarity needs human review.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > table:nth-of-type(1)
Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers
Inspect the saved observations
Lists
None recorded in this field
Definitions
None recorded in this field
Tables
  • Text
    Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > table:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    For this fictional offer, an account owner must confirm retention requirements before importing any real customer data. Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers This makes it easier. It works with the process above.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Plan
    • Starter
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Headers
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Caption
    Plan comparison
    Inspected rows
    2
    Row count limited
    No
Tables without th
  • Text
    Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > table:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    For this fictional offer, an account owner must confirm retention requirements before importing any real customer data. Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers This makes it easier. It works with the process above.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Plan
    • Starter
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Headers
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Caption
    Plan comparison
    Inspected rows
    2
    Row count limited
    No
Opening reference candidates
  • Text
    This makes it easier. It works with the process above.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(10)
    Context
    Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers This makes it easier. It works with the process above. Request a plan review
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Plan
    • Starter
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Retained word count
    10
Extraction or citation outcome
not_measured
Locate all 2 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C06html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(10)

https://northstar.example/product

This makes it easier. It works with the process above.

Context: Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers This makes it easier. It works with the process above. Request a plan review

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 2 · C06html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > table:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/product

Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers

Context: For this fictional offer, an account owner must confirm retention requirements before importing any real customer data. Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers This makes it easier. It works with the process above.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Can a reader identify what an opening 'this' or 'it' refers to?
  • Would extracting this answer omit a condition that changes its meaning?
  • Are observed table fields unambiguous without guessing?

Business information needed

  • Intended interpretation of standalone answers and table fields
NEXT ACTION

Read the cited excerpt with and without its preceding passage. If the subject or necessary condition is ambiguous, name it beside the answer. For a genuine data table, confirm and label the fields; do not add a table just to satisfy a format.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

An editor can identify the subject, field meaning and necessary limits without inventing context; intentional structures are documented.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Observed 0 lists, 0 definition terms and 1 tables; 1 tables have no retained th labels. Standalone clarity needs human review.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(10); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > table:nth-of-type(1)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(10); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > table:nth-of-type(1)

This makes it easier. It works with the process above.

Original rule guidance

Read the listed passages apart from their neighbors, then restore any required subject or condition. For actual data tables, verify field labels; keep a table-free layout if it already communicates clearly.

Re-run C06 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "definitions": [],
  "extraction_or_citation_outcome": "not_measured",
  "lists": [],
  "opening_reference_candidates": [
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers This makes it easier. It works with the process above. Request a plan review",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "Plan",
          "Starter",
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "retained_word_count": 10,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(10)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "This makes it easier. It works with the process above.",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "tables": [
    {
      "area": "main",
      "caption": "Plan comparison",
      "context": "For this fictional offer, an account owner must confirm retention requirements before importing any real customer data. Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers This makes it easier. It works with the process above.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "Plan",
          "Starter"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "headers": [],
      "inspected_rows": 2,
      "row_count_limited": false,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e table:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "tables_without_th": [
    {
      "area": "main",
      "caption": "Plan comparison",
      "context": "For this fictional offer, an account owner must confirm retention requirements before importing any real customer data. Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers This makes it easier. It works with the process above.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "Plan",
          "Starter"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "headers": [],
      "inspected_rows": 2,
      "row_count_limited": false,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e table:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ]
}
C07 Decision and trust informationhttps://northstar.example/product needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C07 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Observed 3 contact/policy/about/source navigation candidates and 0 byline annotations in this retained page inventory; factual credibility was not established.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)
Request a plan review → https://northstar.example/contact
Inspect the saved observations
Applicable context
product
Observed trust navigation
  • Text
    Request a plan review
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    This makes it easier. It works with the process above. Request a plan review
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Href
    https://northstar.example/contact
  • Text
    Privacy
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > footer:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Privacy Contact Northstar
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    footer
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Href
    https://northstar.example/privacy
  • Text
    Contact Northstar
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > footer:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(2)
    Context
    Privacy Contact Northstar
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    footer
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Href
    mailto:help@northstar.example
Observed byline annotations
None recorded in this field
Action candidates
  • Text
    Request a plan review
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    This makes it easier. It works with the process above. Request a plan review
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Href
    https://northstar.example/contact
    Basis
    Literal action wording; intended primary action not established
  • Text
    Contact Northstar
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > footer:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(2)
    Context
    Privacy Contact Northstar
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    footer
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Href
    mailto:help@northstar.example
    Basis
    Literal action wording; intended primary action not established
Scope
Retained raw evidence only; linked pages were not automatically checked.
Qualifications verified
No
Mandatory faq
No
Locate all 3 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C07html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/product

Request a plan review

Context: This makes it easier. It works with the process above. Request a plan review

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 2 · C07html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > footer:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/product

Privacy

Context: Privacy Contact Northstar

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 3 · C07html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > footer:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/product

Contact Northstar

Context: Privacy Contact Northstar

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Can a buyer identify the exact variant, applicable price/quote terms and conditions where relevant?
  • Are suitability, limitations and relevant delivery/return terms easy to locate?

Business information needed

  • Applicable decision requirements and authoritative identity/policy sources
NEXT ACTION

Confirm which terms the visitor needs, then explicitly select the relevant same-site destination within the five-page limit. Compare its exact wording with the owner's current policy before changing this page or its link label.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

The relevant destination has saved evidence and owner-confirmed applicable terms; the link label describes that destination accurately, or a reason for retaining it is recorded.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Observed 3 contact/policy/about/source navigation candidates and 0 byline annotations in this retained page inventory; factual credibility was not established.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > footer:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > footer:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(2)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > footer:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > footer:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(2)

Request a plan review

Original rule guidance

Confirm which decision and trust information this page needs, locate it in the supplied evidence or explicitly select its destination, and add a useful contextual link only after verifying the underlying information.

Re-run C07 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "action_candidates": [
    {
      "area": "main",
      "basis": "Literal action wording; intended primary action not established",
      "context": "This makes it easier. It works with the process above. Request a plan review",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "href": "https://northstar.example/contact",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e a:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "Request a plan review",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "footer",
      "basis": "Literal action wording; intended primary action not established",
      "context": "Privacy Contact Northstar",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "href": "mailto:help@northstar.example",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e footer:nth-of-type(1) \u003e a:nth-of-type(2)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "Contact Northstar",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "applicable_context": "product",
  "mandatory_faq": false,
  "observed_byline_annotations": [],
  "observed_trust_navigation": [
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "This makes it easier. It works with the process above. Request a plan review",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "href": "https://northstar.example/contact",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e a:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Request a plan review",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "footer",
      "context": "Privacy Contact Northstar",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "href": "https://northstar.example/privacy",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e footer:nth-of-type(1) \u003e a:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Privacy",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "footer",
      "context": "Privacy Contact Northstar",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "href": "mailto:help@northstar.example",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e footer:nth-of-type(1) \u003e a:nth-of-type(2)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Contact Northstar",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "qualifications_verified": false,
  "scope": "Retained raw evidence only; linked pages were not automatically checked."
}
C08 Dates and maintenancehttps://northstar.example/product needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C08 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Retained 1 separate date signals; a Last-Modified response header was also observed. Absence of a date does not establish stale content.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(2)
2026-09-24
Inspect the saved observations
Observed date signals
  • Text
    2026-09-24
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(2)
    Context
    2026-09-24
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    body
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • 2026
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Kind
    metadata
    Field
    article:modified_time
Http last modified
Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:00:00 GMT
Last modified meaning
HTTP response metadata; not treated as an editorial update date.
Staleness
not_automatically_determined
Locate all 1 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C08html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/product

2026-09-24

Context: 2026-09-24

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Which date describes publication, an actual revision, an event or a quoted source?
  • Which time-sensitive facts need a current source check?

Business information needed

  • Editorial date meaning and authoritative sources for time-sensitive facts
NEXT ACTION

Ask the owner what each published, updated and body date means. Check whether time-sensitive facts remain correct using their original sources; change dates only to reflect a real, verified event.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-run C08 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Retained 1 separate date signals; a Last-Modified response header was also observed. Absence of a date does not establish stale content.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(2)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(2)

2026-09-24

Original rule guidance

Ask the owner what each published, updated and body date means. Check whether time-sensitive facts remain correct using their original sources; change dates only to reflect a real, verified event.

Re-run C08 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "http_last_modified": "Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:00:00 GMT",
  "last_modified_meaning": "HTTP response metadata; not treated as an editorial update date.",
  "observed_date_signals": [
    {
      "area": "body",
      "context": "2026-09-24",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [
          "2026"
        ],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "field": "article:modified_time",
      "kind": "metadata",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e head:nth-of-type(1) \u003e meta:nth-of-type(2)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "2026-09-24",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "staleness": "not_automatically_determined"
}
C01 Purpose and audiencehttps://northstar.example/implementation needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C01 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Observed 4 retained headings and 0 action labels. Page purpose and audience are user-confirmed, but wording alignment still needs review.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > title:nth-of-type(1)
Northstar implementation service
Inspect the saved observations
Context
Page type
service
Audience
Support team operations managers
Purpose
Assess whether assisted setup fits the team
Primary action
Discuss setup
Questions
Inspect 3 saved items
  • What is included?
  • What must our team provide?
  • When does the stated timeline begin?
Business context
Fictional service context. The assisted package includes onboarding.
Confirmed
Yes
Source status
confirmed_user
Truncated
No
Observed titles
  • Text
    Northstar implementation service
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > title:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Northstar implementation service
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    body
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
Observed heading outline
  • Text
    A guided setup for small support teams
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    A guided setup for small support teams This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    1
  • Text
    How implementation works
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report. How implementation works Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
  • Text
    Required preparation
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)
    Context
    A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded. Required preparation All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
  • Text
    Scope and limitations
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)
    Context
    All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data. Scope and limitations Custom integrations and regulatory advice are outside this fictional package. Confirm security requirements with the responsible business owner.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • package
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
Type candidates
None recorded in this field
Action candidates
None recorded in this field
Semantic alignment
not_automatically_determined
Locate all 6 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > title:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/implementation

Northstar implementation service

Context: Northstar implementation service

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
EVIDENCE 2 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/implementation

A guided setup for small support teams

Context: A guided setup for small support teams This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
EVIDENCE 3 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/implementation

How implementation works

Context: This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report. How implementation works Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
EVIDENCE 4 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/implementation

Required preparation

Context: A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded. Required preparation All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
EVIDENCE 5 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)

https://northstar.example/implementation

Scope and limitations

Context: All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data. Scope and limitations Custom integrations and regulatory advice are outside this fictional package. Confirm security requirements with the responsible business owner.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
EVIDENCE 6 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/implementation

This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.

Context: A guided setup for small support teams This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report. How implementation works

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Who should use this specific page, and what should they be able to do after reading it?
  • Do the cited title, introduction and action communicate the same intended task?
NEXT ACTION

Confirm the intended visitor, page type and task, then compare the title, opening passage and primary action to that brief; revise only an observed mismatch.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-run C01 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Observed 4 retained headings and 0 action labels. Page purpose and audience are user-confirmed, but wording alignment still needs review.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > title:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > title:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)

Northstar implementation service

Original rule guidance

Confirm the intended visitor, page type and task, then compare the title, opening passage and primary action to that brief; revise only an observed mismatch.

Re-run C01 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "action_candidates": [],
  "context": {
    "audience": "Support team operations managers",
    "business_context": "Fictional service context. The assisted package includes onboarding.",
    "confirmed": true,
    "page_type": "service",
    "primary_action": "Discuss setup",
    "purpose": "Assess whether assisted setup fits the team",
    "questions": [
      "What is included?",
      "What must our team provide?",
      "When does the stated timeline begin?"
    ],
    "source_status": "confirmed_user",
    "truncated": false
  },
  "observed_heading_outline": [
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "A guided setup for small support teams This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "level": 1,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h1:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "A guided setup for small support teams",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report. How implementation works Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "level": 2,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h2:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "How implementation works",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded. Required preparation All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "level": 2,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h2:nth-of-type(2)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Required preparation",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data. Scope and limitations Custom integrations and regulatory advice are outside this fictional package. Confirm security requirements with the responsible business owner.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "package"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "level": 2,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h2:nth-of-type(3)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Scope and limitations",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "observed_titles": [
    {
      "area": "body",
      "context": "Northstar implementation service",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e head:nth-of-type(1) \u003e title:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Northstar implementation service",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "semantic_alignment": "not_automatically_determined",
  "type_candidates": []
}
C02 Questions and answer evidencehttps://northstar.example/implementation needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C02 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

3 owner-confirmed questions have passage candidates for review; answer completeness has not been determined.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)
This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.
Question-to-passage map 3 confirmed questions

Literal overlap retrieves candidates only. Heading text alone is not a verified answer, and no candidate does not prove the page lacks an answer.

  1. What is included?

    0 retained candidate(s) · Answer status: needs review

    No literal-overlap candidate was retrieved in the retained inventory. Review the saved page before deciding whether there is a content gap.

  2. What must our team provide?

    0 retained candidate(s) · Answer status: needs review

    No literal-overlap candidate was retrieved in the retained inventory. Review the saved page before deciding whether there is a content gap.

  3. When does the stated timeline begin?

    0 retained candidate(s) · Answer status: needs review

    No literal-overlap candidate was retrieved in the retained inventory. Review the saved page before deciding whether there is a content gap.

Inspect the saved observations
Confirmed question count
3
Question checks
  • Question
    What is included?
    Source status
    confirmed_user
    Answer status
    needs_review
    Verbatim question observed
    No
    Candidate passages
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Meaning
    Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.
  • Question
    What must our team provide?
    Source status
    confirmed_user
    Answer status
    needs_review
    Verbatim question observed
    No
    Candidate passages
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Meaning
    Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.
  • Question
    When does the stated timeline begin?
    Source status
    confirmed_user
    Answer status
    needs_review
    Verbatim question observed
    No
    Candidate passages
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Meaning
    Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.
Unconfirmed questions retained
None recorded in this field
Coverage
Not obtained
Requirements
No universal price, FAQ or word-count requirement is applied.
Locate all 2 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C02html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/implementation

This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.

Context: A guided setup for small support teams This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report. How implementation works

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
EVIDENCE 2 · C02html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/implementation

The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.

Context: Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review. The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan. A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Does each retrieved passage answer the full question, including relevant conditions?
  • Which important question is confirmed by the owner but still needs a verified answer?
NEXT ACTION

For each confirmed question, identify the exact answer passage, its supporting facts and necessary conditions; add content only after the owner confirms a real gap.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

For every confirmed question, record the complete answer, necessary conditions and support, or an owner-confirmed gap to address.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
3 owner-confirmed questions have passage candidates for review; answer completeness has not been determined.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)

This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.

Original rule guidance

For each confirmed question, identify the exact answer passage, its supporting facts and necessary conditions; add content only after the owner confirms a real gap.

Re-run C02 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "confirmed_question_count": 3,
  "coverage": null,
  "question_checks": [
    {
      "answer_status": "needs_review",
      "candidate_passages": [],
      "meaning": "Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.",
      "question": "What is included?",
      "source_status": "confirmed_user",
      "verbatim_question_observed": false
    },
    {
      "answer_status": "needs_review",
      "candidate_passages": [],
      "meaning": "Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.",
      "question": "What must our team provide?",
      "source_status": "confirmed_user",
      "verbatim_question_observed": false
    },
    {
      "answer_status": "needs_review",
      "candidate_passages": [],
      "meaning": "Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.",
      "question": "When does the stated timeline begin?",
      "source_status": "confirmed_user",
      "verbatim_question_observed": false
    }
  ],
  "requirements": "No universal price, FAQ or word-count requirement is applied.",
  "unconfirmed_questions_retained": []
}
C03 Organization and clarityhttps://northstar.example/implementation needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C03 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Observed 0 forward heading-level jumps and 0 exact repeated paragraph groups in retained text. Neither establishes poor content without context.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)
A guided setup for small support teams
Inspect the saved observations
Heading jumps
None recorded in this field
Exact repeated paragraphs
None recorded in this field
Stock phrase candidates
None recorded in this field
Acronym candidates
None recorded in this field
Descriptive counts
Raw text sample words
145
Titles
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
1
Retained
1
Truncated
No
Links
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
2
Retained
2
Truncated
No
Headings
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
4
Retained
4
Truncated
No
Paragraphs
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
6
Retained
6
Truncated
No
Lists
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
1
Retained
1
Truncated
No
Entity candidates
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
2
Retained
2
Truncated
No
Retained paragraph words
104
Quality by length
not_inferred
Locate all 3 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C03html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/implementation

A guided setup for small support teams

Context: A guided setup for small support teams This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
EVIDENCE 2 · C03html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/implementation

How implementation works

Context: This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report. How implementation works Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
EVIDENCE 3 · C03html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/implementation

Required preparation

Context: A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded. Required preparation All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Do heading levels reflect actual section relationships?
  • Is each repeated passage intentional and useful here?
  • Will this audience understand the cited acronyms and general wording?

Business information needed

  • Audience familiarity and reason for intentional repeated content
NEXT ACTION

Review the listed heading transitions and repeated passages; retain intentional policy/boilerplate reuse. Replace a flagged stock phrase only with a more specific supported explanation.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-run C03 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Observed 0 forward heading-level jumps and 0 exact repeated paragraph groups in retained text. Neither establishes poor content without context.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)

A guided setup for small support teams

Original rule guidance

Review the listed heading transitions and repeated passages; retain intentional policy/boilerplate reuse. Replace a flagged stock phrase only with a more specific supported explanation.

Re-run C03 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "acronym_candidates": [],
  "descriptive_counts": {
    "entity_candidates": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 2,
      "retained": 2,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "headings": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 4,
      "retained": 4,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "links": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 2,
      "retained": 2,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "lists": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 1,
      "retained": 1,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "paragraphs": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 6,
      "retained": 6,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "raw_text_sample_words": 145,
    "retained_paragraph_words": 104,
    "titles": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 1,
      "retained": 1,
      "truncated": false
    }
  },
  "exact_repeated_paragraphs": [],
  "heading_jumps": [],
  "quality_by_length": "not_inferred",
  "stock_phrase_candidates": []
}
C04 Entities and factual contexthttps://northstar.example/implementation needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C04 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Retained 2 entity/fact candidates and 0 currency groups with differing amounts. These are comparison candidates, not confirmed business conflicts.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)
The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.
Inspect the saved observations
Literal entity candidates
  • Text
    The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)
    Context
    Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review. The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan. A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Starter
    • package
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • from
    • per
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Nearby links
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/contact
      Label
      Discuss your setup
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    Kind
    price
    Literal
    USD 99
    Currency
    USD
    Additional fields
    2 more in the complete saved data below.
  • Text
    A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)
    Context
    The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan. A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded. Required preparation
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Starter
    • package
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • from
    • per
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Nearby links
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/contact
      Label
      Discuss your setup
      Relationship
      same_container_support_unverified
    Kind
    duration_or_delivery
    Literal
    10 business days
Same currency different amounts
None recorded in this field
User business context
Fictional service context. The assisted package includes onboarding.
Business context status
confirmed_user
Semantic conflicts
not_automatically_determined
Locate all 2 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C04html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/implementation

The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.

Context: Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review. The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan. A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
EVIDENCE 2 · C04html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)

https://northstar.example/implementation

A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded.

Context: The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan. A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded. Required preparation

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Do these statements describe the same product, plan, region and effective date?
  • Is a highlighted amount historical, quoted, conditional or negated?
  • What authoritative business record establishes the correct statement?

Business information needed

  • Dated authoritative offer/specification/policy facts and applicable region or package
NEXT ACTION

Ask the owner to verify the cited amount, specification, delivery and region statements against dated authoritative facts. Compare the same offer and conditions; preserve quotation, negation, historical and package context.

Business owner / content editor

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-run C04 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Retained 2 entity/fact candidates and 0 currency groups with differing amounts. These are comparison candidates, not confirmed business conflicts.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)

The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.

Original rule guidance

Ask the owner to verify the cited amount, specification, delivery and region statements against dated authoritative facts. Compare the same offer and conditions; preserve quotation, negation, historical and package context.

Re-run C04 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "business_context_status": "confirmed_user",
  "literal_entity_candidates": [
    {
      "amount": "99",
      "area": "main",
      "context": "Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review. The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan. A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [
          "from",
          "per"
        ],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "Starter",
          "package",
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "currency": "USD",
      "currency_symbol": "",
      "kind": "price",
      "literal": "USD 99",
      "nearby_links": [
        {
          "label": "Discuss your setup",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/contact"
        }
      ],
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(2)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan. A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded. Required preparation",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [
          "from",
          "per"
        ],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "Starter",
          "package",
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "kind": "duration_or_delivery",
      "literal": "10 business days",
      "nearby_links": [
        {
          "label": "Discuss your setup",
          "relationship": "same_container_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/contact"
        }
      ],
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(3)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded.",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "same_currency_different_amounts": [],
  "semantic_conflicts": "not_automatically_determined",
  "user_business_context": "Fictional service context. The assisted package includes onboarding."
}
C05 Claims and source supporthttps://northstar.example/implementation needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C05 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

No claim candidates were retained by the limited lexical scan. This does not prove the page has no claims or that its claims are supported.

SOURCE EXCERPTsaved response envelope; content acquisition state
No claim candidates were retained by the limited lexical scan. This does not prove the page has no claims or that its claims are supported.
Inspect the saved observations
Claim candidates
None recorded in this field
Candidate count
0
Source support unknown
0
Links fetched
0
Meaning
Nearby links, numbers and author names do not verify a claim. Candidate extraction is non-exhaustive.
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Does the linked original source support this exact wording?
  • What date, population, conditions or method limits the claim?
  • Is this the site's claim, a quotation, a denial or a historical example?

Business information needed

  • Original supporting source, exact passage, date, method and claim ownership
NEXT ACTION

For each cited candidate, locate the original source and exact supporting passage, confirm date/method and scope, then retain, qualify or correct the claim using verified evidence.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-run C05 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
No claim candidates were retained by the limited lexical scan. This does not prove the page has no claims or that its claims are supported.
Evidence location
saved response envelope; content acquisition state
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

saved response envelope; content acquisition state

No claim candidates were retained by the limited lexical scan. This does not prove the page has no claims or that its claims are supported.

Original rule guidance

For each cited candidate, locate the original source and exact supporting passage, confirm date/method and scope, then retain, qualify or correct the claim using verified evidence.

Re-run C05 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "candidate_count": 0,
  "claim_candidates": [],
  "links_fetched": 0,
  "meaning": "Nearby links, numbers and author names do not verify a claim. Candidate extraction is non-exhaustive.",
  "source_support_unknown": 0
}
C06 Extractable structurehttps://northstar.example/implementation needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C06 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Observed 1 lists, 0 definition terms and 0 tables; 0 tables have no retained th labels. Standalone clarity needs human review.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)
This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.
Inspect the saved observations
Lists
  • Text
    Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > ol:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    How implementation works Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review. The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Starter
    • package
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • from
    • per
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Kind
    ol
    Items
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Confirm the team, region and intended report.
    • Review a redacted sample export.
    • Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review.
    Items truncated
    No
Definitions
None recorded in this field
Tables
None recorded in this field
Tables without th
None recorded in this field
Opening reference candidates
  • Text
    This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    A guided setup for small support teams This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report. How implementation works
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Retained word count
    20
Extraction or citation outcome
not_measured
Locate all 2 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C06html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/implementation

This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.

Context: A guided setup for small support teams This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report. How implementation works

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
EVIDENCE 2 · C06html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > ol:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/implementation

Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review.

Context: How implementation works Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review. The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Can a reader identify what an opening 'this' or 'it' refers to?
  • Would extracting this answer omit a condition that changes its meaning?
  • Are observed table fields unambiguous without guessing?

Business information needed

  • Intended interpretation of standalone answers and table fields
NEXT ACTION

Read the cited excerpt with and without its preceding passage. If the subject or necessary condition is ambiguous, name it beside the answer. For a genuine data table, confirm and label the fields; do not add a table just to satisfy a format.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

An editor can identify the subject, field meaning and necessary limits without inventing context; intentional structures are documented.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Observed 1 lists, 0 definition terms and 0 tables; 0 tables have no retained th labels. Standalone clarity needs human review.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > ol:nth-of-type(1)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > ol:nth-of-type(1)

This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.

Original rule guidance

Read the listed passages apart from their neighbors, then restore any required subject or condition. For actual data tables, verify field labels; keep a table-free layout if it already communicates clearly.

Re-run C06 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "definitions": [],
  "extraction_or_citation_outcome": "not_measured",
  "lists": [
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "How implementation works Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review. The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [
          "from",
          "per"
        ],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [
          "Starter",
          "package",
          "plan"
        ],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "items": [
        "Confirm the team, region and intended report.",
        "Review a redacted sample export.",
        "Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review."
      ],
      "items_truncated": false,
      "kind": "ol",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e ol:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review.",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "opening_reference_candidates": [
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "A guided setup for small support teams This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report. How implementation works",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "retained_word_count": 20,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "tables": [],
  "tables_without_th": []
}
C07 Decision and trust informationhttps://northstar.example/implementation needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C07 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Observed 1 contact/policy/about/source navigation candidates and 0 byline annotations in this retained page inventory; factual credibility was not established.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)
Discuss your setup → https://northstar.example/contact
Inspect the saved observations
Applicable context
service
Observed trust navigation
  • Text
    Discuss your setup
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Discuss scope with the implementation lead before selecting the service. Discuss your setup
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Href
    https://northstar.example/contact
Observed byline annotations
None recorded in this field
Action candidates
None recorded in this field
Scope
Retained raw evidence only; linked pages were not automatically checked.
Qualifications verified
No
Mandatory faq
No
Locate all 1 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C07html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/implementation

Discuss your setup

Context: Discuss scope with the implementation lead before selecting the service. Discuss your setup

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Can a prospective buyer understand scope, exclusions, process and the next step?
  • Are qualification claims and any results supported by an original source?

Business information needed

  • Applicable decision requirements and authoritative identity/policy sources
NEXT ACTION

Confirm which terms the visitor needs, then explicitly select the relevant same-site destination within the five-page limit. Compare its exact wording with the owner's current policy before changing this page or its link label.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

The relevant destination has saved evidence and owner-confirmed applicable terms; the link label describes that destination accurately, or a reason for retaining it is recorded.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Observed 1 contact/policy/about/source navigation candidates and 0 byline annotations in this retained page inventory; factual credibility was not established.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)

Discuss your setup

Original rule guidance

Confirm which decision and trust information this page needs, locate it in the supplied evidence or explicitly select its destination, and add a useful contextual link only after verifying the underlying information.

Re-run C07 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "action_candidates": [],
  "applicable_context": "service",
  "mandatory_faq": false,
  "observed_byline_annotations": [],
  "observed_trust_navigation": [
    {
      "area": "main",
      "context": "Discuss scope with the implementation lead before selecting the service. Discuss your setup",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "href": "https://northstar.example/contact",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e a:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Discuss your setup",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "qualifications_verified": false,
  "scope": "Retained raw evidence only; linked pages were not automatically checked."
}
C08 Dates and maintenancehttps://northstar.example/implementation needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C08 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Retained 0 separate date signals; a Last-Modified response header was also observed. Absence of a date does not establish stale content.

SOURCE EXCERPTsaved response envelope; content acquisition state
Retained 0 separate date signals; a Last-Modified response header was also observed. Absence of a date does not establish stale content.
Inspect the saved observations
Observed date signals
None recorded in this field
Http last modified
Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:00:00 GMT
Last modified meaning
HTTP response metadata; not treated as an editorial update date.
Staleness
not_automatically_determined
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Which date describes publication, an actual revision, an event or a quoted source?
  • Which time-sensitive facts need a current source check?

Business information needed

  • Editorial date meaning and authoritative sources for time-sensitive facts
NEXT ACTION

Ask the owner what each published, updated and body date means. Check whether time-sensitive facts remain correct using their original sources; change dates only to reflect a real, verified event.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-run C08 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Final URL
https://northstar.example/implementation
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Retained 0 separate date signals; a Last-Modified response header was also observed. Absence of a date does not establish stale content.
Evidence location
saved response envelope; content acquisition state
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

saved response envelope; content acquisition state

Retained 0 separate date signals; a Last-Modified response header was also observed. Absence of a date does not establish stale content.

Original rule guidance

Ask the owner what each published, updated and body date means. Check whether time-sensitive facts remain correct using their original sources; change dates only to reflect a real, verified event.

Re-run C08 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "http_last_modified": "Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:00:00 GMT",
  "last_modified_meaning": "HTTP response metadata; not treated as an editorial update date.",
  "observed_date_signals": [],
  "staleness": "not_automatically_determined"
}
C01 Purpose and audiencehttps://northstar.example/guide needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C01 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Observed 4 retained headings and 0 action labels. Page purpose and audience are user-confirmed, but wording alignment still needs review.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > title:nth-of-type(1)
How to compare support reporting tools
Inspect the saved observations
Context
Page type
article
Audience
Operations managers
Purpose
Compare workflow requirements
Primary action
Review the comparison questions
Questions
Inspect 1 saved items
  • How should we compare workflows?
Business context
An educational article; no standalone price or FAQ requirement.
Confirmed
Yes
Source status
confirmed_user
Truncated
No
Observed titles
  • Text
    How to compare support reporting tools
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > title:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    How to compare support reporting tools
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    body
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
Observed heading outline
  • Text
    How to compare support reporting tools
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    How to compare support reporting tools By Northstar editorial team — fictional author attribution for this simulation.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    article
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    1
  • Text
    Begin with the task
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price. Begin with the task List the decision the report must support, who will use it, and the source of each data field.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    article
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • not
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
  • Text
    What should a team verify?
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)
    Context
    List the decision the report must support, who will use it, and the source of each data field. What should a team verify? Check sample exports for missing fields. Ask the owner to confirm retention, access and regional requirements.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    article
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
  • Text
    Compare the scope
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)
    Context
    Review cycle The interval between collecting a dataset and agreeing on actions. Compare the scope Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded?
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    article
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
Type candidates
  • Text
    article element
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    An article element was observed; editorial purpose remains unconfirmed.
    Basis
    HTML article markup
    Source status
    inferred
Action candidates
None recorded in this field
Semantic alignment
not_automatically_determined
Locate all 6 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > title:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/guide

How to compare support reporting tools

Context: How to compare support reporting tools

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
EVIDENCE 2 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/guide

How to compare support reporting tools

Context: How to compare support reporting tools By Northstar editorial team — fictional author attribution for this simulation.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
EVIDENCE 3 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/guide

Begin with the task

Context: This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price. Begin with the task List the decision the report must support, who will use it, and the source of each data field.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
EVIDENCE 4 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/guide

What should a team verify?

Context: List the decision the report must support, who will use it, and the source of each data field. What should a team verify? Check sample exports for missing fields. Ask the owner to confirm retention, access and regional requirements.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
EVIDENCE 5 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)

https://northstar.example/guide

Compare the scope

Context: Review cycle The interval between collecting a dataset and agreeing on actions. Compare the scope Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded?

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
EVIDENCE 6 · C01html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/guide

By Northstar editorial team — fictional author attribution for this simulation.

Context: How to compare support reporting tools By Northstar editorial team — fictional author attribution for this simulation. Updated August 1, 2026

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Who should use this specific page, and what should they be able to do after reading it?
  • Do the cited title, introduction and action communicate the same intended task?
NEXT ACTION

Confirm the intended visitor, page type and task, then compare the title, opening passage and primary action to that brief; revise only an observed mismatch.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-run C01 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Observed 4 retained headings and 0 action labels. Page purpose and audience are user-confirmed, but wording alignment still needs review.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > title:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > title:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)

How to compare support reporting tools

Original rule guidance

Confirm the intended visitor, page type and task, then compare the title, opening passage and primary action to that brief; revise only an observed mismatch.

Re-run C01 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "action_candidates": [],
  "context": {
    "audience": "Operations managers",
    "business_context": "An educational article; no standalone price or FAQ requirement.",
    "confirmed": true,
    "page_type": "article",
    "primary_action": "Review the comparison questions",
    "purpose": "Compare workflow requirements",
    "questions": [
      "How should we compare workflows?"
    ],
    "source_status": "confirmed_user",
    "truncated": false
  },
  "observed_heading_outline": [
    {
      "area": "article",
      "context": "How to compare support reporting tools By Northstar editorial team \u2014 fictional author attribution for this simulation.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "level": 1,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h1:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "How to compare support reporting tools",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "article",
      "context": "This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team\u0027s needs. The article does not offer a purchase price. Begin with the task List the decision the report must support, who will use it, and the source of each data field.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [
          "not"
        ],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "level": 2,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h2:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Begin with the task",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "article",
      "context": "List the decision the report must support, who will use it, and the source of each data field. What should a team verify? Check sample exports for missing fields. Ask the owner to confirm retention, access and regional requirements.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "level": 2,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h2:nth-of-type(2)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "What should a team verify?",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "article",
      "context": "Review cycle The interval between collecting a dataset and agreeing on actions. Compare the scope Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded?",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "level": 2,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h2:nth-of-type(3)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Compare the scope",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "observed_titles": [
    {
      "area": "body",
      "context": "How to compare support reporting tools",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e head:nth-of-type(1) \u003e title:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "How to compare support reporting tools",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "semantic_alignment": "not_automatically_determined",
  "type_candidates": [
    {
      "basis": "HTML article markup",
      "context": "An article element was observed; editorial purpose remains unconfirmed.",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "text": "article element"
    }
  ]
}
C02 Questions and answer evidencehttps://northstar.example/guide needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C02 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

1 owner-confirmed questions have passage candidates for review; answer completeness has not been determined.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)
This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.
Question-to-passage map 1 confirmed questions

Literal overlap retrieves candidates only. Heading text alone is not a verified answer, and no candidate does not prove the page lacks an answer.

  1. How should we compare workflows?

    3 retained candidate(s) · Answer status: needs review

    PASSAGE CANDIDATE · NOT VERIFIEDhtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)
    This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.
    PASSAGE CANDIDATE · NOT VERIFIEDhtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)
    There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.
    PASSAGE CANDIDATE · NOT VERIFIEDhtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)
    How to compare support reporting tools
Inspect the saved observations
Confirmed question count
1
Question checks
  • Question
    How should we compare workflows?
    Source status
    confirmed_user
    Answer status
    needs_review
    Verbatim question observed
    No
    Candidate passages
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Text
      This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)
      Context
      Updated August 1, 2026 This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price. Begin with the task
      Text truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Area
      article
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • not
      Historical
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • 2026
      Package
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Region
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Condition
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Quotation
      No
      Source status
      observed
      Retained word count
      23
      Matching words
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • compare
      Retrieval method
      literal_word_overlap_not_answer_validation
    • Text
      There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)
      Context
      Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded? There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.
      Text truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Area
      article
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • no
      Historical
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Package
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Region
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Condition
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • only
      Quotation
      No
      Source status
      observed
      Retained word count
      21
      Matching words
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • compare
      Retrieval method
      literal_word_overlap_not_answer_validation
    • Text
      How to compare support reporting tools
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)
      Context
      How to compare support reporting tools By Northstar editorial team — fictional author attribution for this simulation.
      Text truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Area
      article
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Historical
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Package
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Region
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Condition
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Quotation
      No
      Source status
      observed
      Level
      1
      Matching words
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • compare
      Retrieval method
      literal_word_overlap_not_answer_validation
    Meaning
    Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.
Unconfirmed questions retained
None recorded in this field
Coverage
Not obtained
Requirements
No universal price, FAQ or word-count requirement is applied.
Locate all 3 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C02html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/guide

This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.

Context: Updated August 1, 2026 This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price. Begin with the task

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
EVIDENCE 2 · C02html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)

https://northstar.example/guide

There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.

Context: Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded? There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
EVIDENCE 3 · C02html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/guide

How to compare support reporting tools

Context: How to compare support reporting tools By Northstar editorial team — fictional author attribution for this simulation.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Does each retrieved passage answer the full question, including relevant conditions?
  • Which important question is confirmed by the owner but still needs a verified answer?
NEXT ACTION

For each confirmed question, identify the exact answer passage, its supporting facts and necessary conditions; add content only after the owner confirms a real gap.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

For every confirmed question, record the complete answer, necessary conditions and support, or an owner-confirmed gap to address.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
1 owner-confirmed questions have passage candidates for review; answer completeness has not been determined.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)

This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.

Original rule guidance

For each confirmed question, identify the exact answer passage, its supporting facts and necessary conditions; add content only after the owner confirms a real gap.

Re-run C02 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "confirmed_question_count": 1,
  "coverage": null,
  "question_checks": [
    {
      "answer_status": "needs_review",
      "candidate_passages": [
        {
          "area": "article",
          "context": "Updated August 1, 2026 This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team\u0027s needs. The article does not offer a purchase price. Begin with the task",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [],
            "historical": [
              "2026"
            ],
            "negation": [
              "not"
            ],
            "package": [],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": []
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "matching_words": [
            "compare"
          ],
          "retained_word_count": 23,
          "retrieval_method": "literal_word_overlap_not_answer_validation",
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(2)",
          "source_status": "observed",
          "text": "This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team\u0027s needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.",
          "text_truncated": false
        },
        {
          "area": "article",
          "context": "Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded? There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [
              "only"
            ],
            "historical": [],
            "negation": [
              "no"
            ],
            "package": [],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": []
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "matching_words": [
            "compare"
          ],
          "retained_word_count": 21,
          "retrieval_method": "literal_word_overlap_not_answer_validation",
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(5)",
          "source_status": "observed",
          "text": "There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.",
          "text_truncated": false
        },
        {
          "area": "article",
          "context": "How to compare support reporting tools By Northstar editorial team \u2014 fictional author attribution for this simulation.",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [],
            "historical": [],
            "negation": [],
            "package": [],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": []
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "level": 1,
          "matching_words": [
            "compare"
          ],
          "retrieval_method": "literal_word_overlap_not_answer_validation",
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e h1:nth-of-type(1)",
          "source_status": "observed",
          "text": "How to compare support reporting tools",
          "text_truncated": false
        }
      ],
      "meaning": "Retrieved passages require human answer mapping; no match does not prove an answer is absent.",
      "question": "How should we compare workflows?",
      "source_status": "confirmed_user",
      "verbatim_question_observed": false
    }
  ],
  "requirements": "No universal price, FAQ or word-count requirement is applied.",
  "unconfirmed_questions_retained": []
}
C03 Organization and clarityhttps://northstar.example/guide needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C03 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Observed 0 forward heading-level jumps and 0 exact repeated paragraph groups in retained text. Neither establishes poor content without context.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)
How to compare support reporting tools
Inspect the saved observations
Heading jumps
None recorded in this field
Exact repeated paragraphs
None recorded in this field
Stock phrase candidates
None recorded in this field
Acronym candidates
None recorded in this field
Descriptive counts
Raw text sample words
140
Titles
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
1
Retained
1
Truncated
No
Dates
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
3
Retained
3
Truncated
No
Type clues
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
1
Retained
1
Truncated
No
Headings
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
4
Retained
4
Truncated
No
Paragraphs
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
5
Retained
5
Truncated
No
Definitions
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
1
Retained
1
Truncated
No
Tables
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
1
Retained
1
Truncated
No
Links
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
2
Retained
2
Truncated
No
Claim candidates
Inspect 3 saved fields
Observed within node limit
1
Retained
1
Truncated
No
Retained paragraph words
89
Quality by length
not_inferred
Locate all 3 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C03html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/guide

How to compare support reporting tools

Context: How to compare support reporting tools By Northstar editorial team — fictional author attribution for this simulation.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
EVIDENCE 2 · C03html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/guide

Begin with the task

Context: This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price. Begin with the task List the decision the report must support, who will use it, and the source of each data field.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
EVIDENCE 3 · C03html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/guide

What should a team verify?

Context: List the decision the report must support, who will use it, and the source of each data field. What should a team verify? Check sample exports for missing fields. Ask the owner to confirm retention, access and regional requirements.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Do heading levels reflect actual section relationships?
  • Is each repeated passage intentional and useful here?
  • Will this audience understand the cited acronyms and general wording?

Business information needed

  • Audience familiarity and reason for intentional repeated content
NEXT ACTION

Review the listed heading transitions and repeated passages; retain intentional policy/boilerplate reuse. Replace a flagged stock phrase only with a more specific supported explanation.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-run C03 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Observed 0 forward heading-level jumps and 0 exact repeated paragraph groups in retained text. Neither establishes poor content without context.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)

How to compare support reporting tools

Original rule guidance

Review the listed heading transitions and repeated passages; retain intentional policy/boilerplate reuse. Replace a flagged stock phrase only with a more specific supported explanation.

Re-run C03 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "acronym_candidates": [],
  "descriptive_counts": {
    "claim_candidates": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 1,
      "retained": 1,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "dates": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 3,
      "retained": 3,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "definitions": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 1,
      "retained": 1,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "headings": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 4,
      "retained": 4,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "links": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 2,
      "retained": 2,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "paragraphs": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 5,
      "retained": 5,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "raw_text_sample_words": 140,
    "retained_paragraph_words": 89,
    "tables": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 1,
      "retained": 1,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "titles": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 1,
      "retained": 1,
      "truncated": false
    },
    "type_clues": {
      "observed_within_node_limit": 1,
      "retained": 1,
      "truncated": false
    }
  },
  "exact_repeated_paragraphs": [],
  "heading_jumps": [],
  "quality_by_length": "not_inferred",
  "stock_phrase_candidates": []
}
C04 Entities and factual contexthttps://northstar.example/guide needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C04 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Retained 0 entity/fact candidates and 0 currency groups with differing amounts. These are comparison candidates, not confirmed business conflicts.

SOURCE EXCERPTsaved response envelope; content acquisition state
Retained 0 entity/fact candidates and 0 currency groups with differing amounts. These are comparison candidates, not confirmed business conflicts.
Inspect the saved observations
Literal entity candidates
None recorded in this field
Same currency different amounts
None recorded in this field
User business context
An educational article; no standalone price or FAQ requirement.
Business context status
confirmed_user
Semantic conflicts
not_automatically_determined
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Do these statements describe the same product, plan, region and effective date?
  • Is a highlighted amount historical, quoted, conditional or negated?
  • What authoritative business record establishes the correct statement?

Business information needed

  • Dated authoritative offer/specification/policy facts and applicable region or package
NEXT ACTION

Ask the owner to verify the cited amount, specification, delivery and region statements against dated authoritative facts. Compare the same offer and conditions; preserve quotation, negation, historical and package context.

Business owner / content editor

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-run C04 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Retained 0 entity/fact candidates and 0 currency groups with differing amounts. These are comparison candidates, not confirmed business conflicts.
Evidence location
saved response envelope; content acquisition state
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

saved response envelope; content acquisition state

Retained 0 entity/fact candidates and 0 currency groups with differing amounts. These are comparison candidates, not confirmed business conflicts.

Original rule guidance

Ask the owner to verify the cited amount, specification, delivery and region statements against dated authoritative facts. Compare the same offer and conditions; preserve quotation, negation, historical and package context.

Re-run C04 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "business_context_status": "confirmed_user",
  "literal_entity_candidates": [],
  "same_currency_different_amounts": [],
  "semantic_conflicts": "not_automatically_determined",
  "user_business_context": "An educational article; no standalone price or FAQ requirement."
}
C05 Claims and source supporthttps://northstar.example/guide needs review
P2 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C05 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Retained 1 numerical/performance/comparison claim candidates; source support remains unknown for all of them.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)
There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.
Inspect the saved observations
Claim candidates
  • Text
    There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)
    Context
    Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded? There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    article
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • no
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • only
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    inferred
    Nearby links
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/product
      Label
      self-serve workspace
      Relationship
      same_block_support_unverified
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/implementation
      Label
      assisted implementation
      Relationship
      same_block_support_unverified
    Candidate signals
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • best
    Source support
    unknown
    Source dates
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
Candidate count
1
Source support unknown
1
Links fetched
0
Meaning
Nearby links, numbers and author names do not verify a claim. Candidate extraction is non-exhaustive.
Locate all 1 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C05html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)

https://northstar.example/guide

There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.

Context: Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded? There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Does the linked original source support this exact wording?
  • What date, population, conditions or method limits the claim?
  • Is this the site's claim, a quotation, a denial or a historical example?

Business information needed

  • Original supporting source, exact passage, date, method and claim ownership
NEXT ACTION

Open the cited passage in context. Identify claim ownership, then record the original source and exact supporting passage, date, method and conditions. Qualify or remove the claim only if that review establishes a problem.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

The reviewer records a support decision, source passage and applicable conditions for each candidate. Unsupported wording is corrected with owner approval.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Retained 1 numerical/performance/comparison claim candidates; source support remains unknown for all of them.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)

There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.

Original rule guidance

For each cited candidate, locate the original source and exact supporting passage, confirm date/method and scope, then retain, qualify or correct the claim using verified evidence.

Re-run C05 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "candidate_count": 1,
  "claim_candidates": [
    {
      "area": "article",
      "candidate_signals": [
        "best"
      ],
      "context": "Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded? There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [
          "only"
        ],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [
          "no"
        ],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "nearby_links": [
        {
          "label": "self-serve workspace",
          "relationship": "same_block_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/product"
        },
        {
          "label": "assisted implementation",
          "relationship": "same_block_support_unverified",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/implementation"
        }
      ],
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(5)",
      "source_dates": [],
      "source_status": "inferred",
      "source_support": "unknown",
      "text": "There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "links_fetched": 0,
  "meaning": "Nearby links, numbers and author names do not verify a claim. Candidate extraction is non-exhaustive.",
  "source_support_unknown": 1
}
C06 Extractable structurehttps://northstar.example/guide needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C06 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Observed 0 lists, 1 definition terms and 1 tables; 0 tables have no retained th labels. Standalone clarity needs human review.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)
This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.
Inspect the saved observations
Lists
None recorded in this field
Definitions
  • Text
    Review cycle
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > dl:nth-of-type(1) > dt:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Review cycle The interval between collecting a dataset and agreeing on actions.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    article
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Definition
    The interval between collecting a dataset and agreeing on actions.
Tables
  • Text
    Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded?
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > table:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Compare the scope Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded? There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    article
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • no
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • only
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Headers
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Area
    • Question
    Caption
    Questions for evaluating a workflow
    Inspected rows
    3
    Row count limited
    No
Tables without th
None recorded in this field
Opening reference candidates
  • Text
    This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)
    Context
    Updated August 1, 2026 This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price. Begin with the task
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    article
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • not
    Historical
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • 2026
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Retained word count
    23
Extraction or citation outcome
not_measured
Locate all 2 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C06html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/guide

This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.

Context: Updated August 1, 2026 This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price. Begin with the task

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
EVIDENCE 2 · C06html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > dl:nth-of-type(1) > dt:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/guide

Review cycle

Context: Review cycle The interval between collecting a dataset and agreeing on actions.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Can a reader identify what an opening 'this' or 'it' refers to?
  • Would extracting this answer omit a condition that changes its meaning?
  • Are observed table fields unambiguous without guessing?

Business information needed

  • Intended interpretation of standalone answers and table fields
NEXT ACTION

Read the cited excerpt with and without its preceding passage. If the subject or necessary condition is ambiguous, name it beside the answer. For a genuine data table, confirm and label the fields; do not add a table just to satisfy a format.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

An editor can identify the subject, field meaning and necessary limits without inventing context; intentional structures are documented.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Observed 0 lists, 1 definition terms and 1 tables; 0 tables have no retained th labels. Standalone clarity needs human review.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > dl:nth-of-type(1) > dt:nth-of-type(1)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > dl:nth-of-type(1) > dt:nth-of-type(1)

This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.

Original rule guidance

Read the listed passages apart from their neighbors, then restore any required subject or condition. For actual data tables, verify field labels; keep a table-free layout if it already communicates clearly.

Re-run C06 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "definitions": [
    {
      "area": "article",
      "context": "Review cycle The interval between collecting a dataset and agreeing on actions.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "definition": "The interval between collecting a dataset and agreeing on actions.",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e dl:nth-of-type(1) \u003e dt:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Review cycle",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "extraction_or_citation_outcome": "not_measured",
  "lists": [],
  "opening_reference_candidates": [
    {
      "area": "article",
      "context": "Updated August 1, 2026 This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team\u0027s needs. The article does not offer a purchase price. Begin with the task",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [
          "2026"
        ],
        "negation": [
          "not"
        ],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "retained_word_count": 23,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(2)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team\u0027s needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "tables": [
    {
      "area": "article",
      "caption": "Questions for evaluating a workflow",
      "context": "Compare the scope Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded? There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [
          "only"
        ],
        "historical": [],
        "negation": [
          "no"
        ],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "headers": [
        "Area",
        "Question"
      ],
      "inspected_rows": 3,
      "row_count_limited": false,
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e table:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded?",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "tables_without_th": []
}
C07 Decision and trust informationhttps://northstar.example/guide needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C07 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Observed 0 contact/policy/about/source navigation candidates and 0 byline annotations in this retained page inventory; factual credibility was not established.

SOURCE EXCERPTsaved response envelope; content acquisition state
Observed 0 contact/policy/about/source navigation candidates and 0 byline annotations in this retained page inventory; factual credibility was not established.
Inspect the saved observations
Applicable context
article
Observed trust navigation
None recorded in this field
Observed byline annotations
None recorded in this field
Action candidates
None recorded in this field
Scope
Retained raw evidence only; linked pages were not automatically checked.
Qualifications verified
No
Mandatory faq
No
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Can readers identify the author, method or original source where relevant?
  • Are applicable limitations explained beside the conclusion?

Business information needed

  • Applicable decision requirements and authoritative identity/policy sources
NEXT ACTION

Confirm which decision and trust information this page needs, locate it in the supplied evidence or explicitly select its destination, and add a useful contextual link only after verifying the underlying information.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-run C07 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Observed 0 contact/policy/about/source navigation candidates and 0 byline annotations in this retained page inventory; factual credibility was not established.
Evidence location
saved response envelope; content acquisition state
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

saved response envelope; content acquisition state

Observed 0 contact/policy/about/source navigation candidates and 0 byline annotations in this retained page inventory; factual credibility was not established.

Original rule guidance

Confirm which decision and trust information this page needs, locate it in the supplied evidence or explicitly select its destination, and add a useful contextual link only after verifying the underlying information.

Re-run C07 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "action_candidates": [],
  "applicable_context": "article",
  "mandatory_faq": false,
  "observed_byline_annotations": [],
  "observed_trust_navigation": [],
  "qualifications_verified": false,
  "scope": "Retained raw evidence only; linked pages were not automatically checked."
}
C08 Dates and maintenancehttps://northstar.example/guide needs review
P3 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C08 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Retained 3 separate date signals; a Last-Modified response header was also observed. Absence of a date does not establish stale content.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(1)
2025-04-15
Inspect the saved observations
Observed date signals
  • Text
    2025-04-15
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    How to compare support reporting tools 2025-04-15
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    body
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • 2025
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Kind
    metadata
    Field
    article:published_time
  • Text
    2026-08-01
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(2)
    Context
    2026-08-01
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    body
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • 2026
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Kind
    metadata
    Field
    article:modified_time
  • Text
    Updated August 1, 2026
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > time:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    By Northstar editorial team — fictional author attribution for this simulation. Updated August 1, 2026 This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    article
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • not
    Historical
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • 2026
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Kind
    time_element
    Datetime
    2026-08-01
Http last modified
Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:00:00 GMT
Last modified meaning
HTTP response metadata; not treated as an editorial update date.
Staleness
not_automatically_determined
Locate all 3 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C08html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/guide

2025-04-15

Context: How to compare support reporting tools 2025-04-15

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
EVIDENCE 2 · C08html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/guide

2026-08-01

Context: 2026-08-01

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
EVIDENCE 3 · C08html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > time:nth-of-type(1)

https://northstar.example/guide

Updated August 1, 2026

Context: By Northstar editorial team — fictional author attribution for this simulation. Updated August 1, 2026 This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Which date describes publication, an actual revision, an event or a quoted source?
  • Which time-sensitive facts need a current source check?

Business information needed

  • Editorial date meaning and authoritative sources for time-sensitive facts
NEXT ACTION

Ask the owner what each published, updated and body date means. Check whether time-sensitive facts remain correct using their original sources; change dates only to reflect a real, verified event.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-run C08 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Final URL
https://northstar.example/guide
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Retained 3 separate date signals; a Last-Modified response header was also observed. Absence of a date does not establish stale content.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > time:nth-of-type(1)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(1); html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(2); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > time:nth-of-type(1)

2025-04-15

Original rule guidance

Ask the owner what each published, updated and body date means. Check whether time-sensitive facts remain correct using their original sources; change dates only to reflect a real, verified event.

Re-run C08 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "http_last_modified": "Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:00:00 GMT",
  "last_modified_meaning": "HTTP response metadata; not treated as an editorial update date.",
  "observed_date_signals": [
    {
      "area": "body",
      "context": "How to compare support reporting tools 2025-04-15",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [
          "2025"
        ],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "field": "article:published_time",
      "kind": "metadata",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e head:nth-of-type(1) \u003e meta:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "2025-04-15",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "body",
      "context": "2026-08-01",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [
          "2026"
        ],
        "negation": [],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "field": "article:modified_time",
      "kind": "metadata",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e head:nth-of-type(1) \u003e meta:nth-of-type(2)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "2026-08-01",
      "text_truncated": false
    },
    {
      "area": "article",
      "context": "By Northstar editorial team \u2014 fictional author attribution for this simulation. Updated August 1, 2026 This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team\u0027s needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.",
      "context_cues": {
        "condition": [],
        "historical": [
          "2026"
        ],
        "negation": [
          "not"
        ],
        "package": [],
        "quotation": false,
        "region": []
      },
      "context_truncated": false,
      "datetime": "2026-08-01",
      "kind": "time_element",
      "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e time:nth-of-type(1)",
      "source_status": "observed",
      "text": "Updated August 1, 2026",
      "text_truncated": false
    }
  ],
  "staleness": "not_automatically_determined"
}
C09 Relationships in the selected pagesselected-scope:https://northstar.example/product needs review
P2 · info severitycontrolled fixture · C09 v2.0.0
WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS

Compared 3 usable selected pages: 1 exact repeated paragraph groups, 3 heading-word intersections and 1 price-difference candidates. No site-wide or semantic conflict conclusion was made.

SOURCE EXCERPThtml:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(8)
All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.
Inspect the saved observations
Selected urls
  • https://northstar.example/product
  • https://northstar.example/implementation
  • https://northstar.example/guide
Usable urls
  • https://northstar.example/product
  • https://northstar.example/implementation
  • https://northstar.example/guide
Scope
Only explicitly selected pages and retained raw evidence; never site-wide.
Exact repeated paragraphs
  • Text
    All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.
    Occurrences
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/product
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(8)
      Excerpt
      All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.
      Context
      Before you choose All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data. For this fictional offer, an account owner must confirm retention requirements before importing any real customer data.
      Snapshot ref
      sample-product.json
      Content hash
      7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
      Source status
      observed
      Excerpt truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Historical
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Package
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Region
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Condition
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Quotation
      No
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/implementation
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4)
      Excerpt
      All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.
      Context
      Required preparation All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data. Scope and limitations
      Snapshot ref
      sample-implementation.json
      Content hash
      015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
      Source status
      observed
      Excerpt truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Historical
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Package
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Region
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Condition
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Quotation
      No
    Occurrences truncated
    No
    Interpretation
    Exact normalized text reuse, possibly intentional; semantic quality not determined.
Heading word intersections
  • Urls
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • https://northstar.example/product
    • https://northstar.example/implementation
    Words
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • support
    • teams
    Truncated
    No
    Interpretation
    Literal shared heading words, not semantic topic equivalence or keyword competition.
  • Urls
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • https://northstar.example/product
    • https://northstar.example/guide
    Words
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • support
    Truncated
    No
    Interpretation
    Literal shared heading words, not semantic topic equivalence or keyword competition.
  • Urls
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • https://northstar.example/implementation
    • https://northstar.example/guide
    Words
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • scope
    • support
    Truncated
    No
    Interpretation
    Literal shared heading words, not semantic topic equivalence or keyword competition.
Price difference candidates
  • Urls
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • https://northstar.example/product
    • https://northstar.example/implementation
    Currency
    USD
    Left amounts
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • 29
    • 39
    • 79
    Right amounts
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • 99
    Evidence
    Inspect 4 saved items
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/product
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)
      Excerpt
      The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
      Context
      Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
      Snapshot ref
      sample-product.json
      Content hash
      7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
      Source status
      inferred
      Excerpt truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Historical
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Package
      Inspect 3 saved items
      • Plan
      • Starter
      • plan
      Region
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • UK
      • United States
      Condition
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • per
      Quotation
      No
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/product
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4)
      Excerpt
      The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.
      Context
      The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.
      Snapshot ref
      sample-product.json
      Content hash
      7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
      Source status
      inferred
      Excerpt truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • no
      Historical
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • 2024
      • historical
      Package
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • Starter
      • plan
      Region
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • UK
      • United States
      Condition
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • per
      Quotation
      No
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/product
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)
      Excerpt
      In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.
      Context
      The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available. We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.
      Snapshot ref
      sample-product.json
      Content hash
      7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
      Source status
      inferred
      Excerpt truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • no
      • not
      Historical
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • 2024
      • historical
      Package
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • Starter
      • plan
      Region
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Condition
      Inspect 1 saved items
      • per
      Quotation
      No
    • Url
      https://northstar.example/implementation
      Selector
      html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)
      Excerpt
      The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.
      Context
      Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review. The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan. A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded.
      Snapshot ref
      sample-implementation.json
      Content hash
      015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
      Source status
      inferred
      Excerpt truncated
      No
      Context truncated
      No
      Context cues
      Inspect 6 saved fields
      Negation
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Historical
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Package
      Inspect 3 saved items
      • Starter
      • package
      • plan
      Region
      Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
      Condition
      Inspect 2 saved items
      • from
      • per
      Quotation
      No
    Interpretation
    Different observed amounts; product, region, tier and effective date must be verified before alleging conflict.
Observed selected links
  • From
    https://northstar.example/product
    To
    https://northstar.example/implementation
    Anchor
    Implementation
    Evidence
    Inspect 10 saved fields
    Url
    https://northstar.example/product
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > nav:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)
    Excerpt
    Implementation
    Context
    Implementation Buying guide
    Snapshot ref
    sample-product.json
    Content hash
    7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
    Source status
    observed
    Excerpt truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
  • From
    https://northstar.example/product
    To
    https://northstar.example/guide
    Anchor
    Buying guide
    Evidence
    Inspect 10 saved fields
    Url
    https://northstar.example/product
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > nav:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(2)
    Excerpt
    Buying guide
    Context
    Implementation Buying guide
    Snapshot ref
    sample-product.json
    Content hash
    7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
    Source status
    observed
    Excerpt truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
  • From
    https://northstar.example/implementation
    To
    https://northstar.example/product
    Anchor
    Workspace plans
    Evidence
    Inspect 10 saved fields
    Url
    https://northstar.example/implementation
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > nav:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)
    Excerpt
    Workspace plans
    Context
    Workspace plans
    Snapshot ref
    sample-implementation.json
    Content hash
    015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
    Source status
    observed
    Excerpt truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
  • From
    https://northstar.example/guide
    To
    https://northstar.example/product
    Anchor
    self-serve workspace
    Evidence
    Inspect 10 saved fields
    Url
    https://northstar.example/guide
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5) > a:nth-of-type(1)
    Excerpt
    self-serve workspace
    Context
    self-serve workspace assisted implementation
    Snapshot ref
    sample-guide.json
    Content hash
    3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
    Source status
    observed
    Excerpt truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
  • From
    https://northstar.example/guide
    To
    https://northstar.example/implementation
    Anchor
    assisted implementation
    Evidence
    Inspect 10 saved fields
    Url
    https://northstar.example/guide
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5) > a:nth-of-type(2)
    Excerpt
    assisted implementation
    Context
    self-serve workspace assisted implementation
    Snapshot ref
    sample-guide.json
    Content hash
    3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0
    Source status
    observed
    Excerpt truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
Inventory limits
Locate all 6 evidence item(s)
EVIDENCE 1 · C09html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(8)

https://northstar.example/product

All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.

Context: Before you choose All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data. For this fictional offer, an account owner must confirm retention requirements before importing any real customer data.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 2 · C09html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4)

https://northstar.example/implementation

All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.

Context: Required preparation All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data. Scope and limitations

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
EVIDENCE 3 · C09html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)

https://northstar.example/product

The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.

Context: Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 4 · C09html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4)

https://northstar.example/product

The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.

Context: The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 5 · C09html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)

https://northstar.example/product

In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.

Context: The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available. We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b
EVIDENCE 6 · C09html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)

https://northstar.example/implementation

The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.

Context: Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review. The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan. A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded.

Download simulated source snapshot ↗015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3
HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED

Questions to resolve

  • Is the shared paragraph intentional policy/boilerplate or unhelpful duplication?
  • Do compared prices refer to the same offer, region, period and package?
  • Are observed selected-page links appropriate for the reader task?

Business information needed

  • Selected-page roles, authoritative offer facts and intentional reuse/navigation policy
NEXT ACTION

Review cited cross-page passages as the same business offer only after confirming package, region and effective date. Retain useful shared policy text; revise unnecessary repetition or navigation only after confirming its purpose.

Content editor / business owner

CMS / file location: to be located.

HOW TO RETEST

Re-run C09 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Traceability, expected condition & complete data
Input URL
selected-scope:https://northstar.example/product
Final URL
https://northstar.example/product
Observed at
2026-10-11T07:00:00+00:00
Expected condition
Review observed raw passages against confirmed audience, business facts and source context; no automated semantic verdict.
Applicability
applicable
Severity basis
Compared 3 usable selected pages: 1 exact repeated paragraph groups, 3 heading-word intersections and 1 price-difference candidates. No site-wide or semantic conflict conclusion was made.
Evidence location
html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(8); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)
Snapshot / SHA-256
Download simulated evidence ↗7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b

Hashes detect changes to saved data. They do not prove source authenticity.

Original saved excerpt

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(8); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4); html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)

All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.

Original rule guidance

Review cited cross-page passages as the same business offer only after confirming package, region and effective date. Retain useful shared policy text; revise unnecessary repetition or navigation only after confirming its purpose.

Re-run C09 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.

Complete saved observation

{
  "exact_repeated_paragraphs": [
    {
      "interpretation": "Exact normalized text reuse, possibly intentional; semantic quality not determined.",
      "occurrences": [
        {
          "content_hash": "7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b",
          "context": "Before you choose All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data. For this fictional offer, an account owner must confirm retention requirements before importing any real customer data.",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [],
            "historical": [],
            "negation": [],
            "package": [],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": []
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "excerpt": "All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.",
          "excerpt_truncated": false,
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(8)",
          "snapshot_ref": "sample-product.json",
          "source_status": "observed",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/product"
        },
        {
          "content_hash": "015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3",
          "context": "Required preparation All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data. Scope and limitations",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [],
            "historical": [],
            "negation": [],
            "package": [],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": []
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "excerpt": "All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.",
          "excerpt_truncated": false,
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(4)",
          "snapshot_ref": "sample-implementation.json",
          "source_status": "observed",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/implementation"
        }
      ],
      "occurrences_truncated": false,
      "text": "All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data."
    }
  ],
  "heading_word_intersections": [
    {
      "interpretation": "Literal shared heading words, not semantic topic equivalence or keyword competition.",
      "truncated": false,
      "urls": [
        "https://northstar.example/product",
        "https://northstar.example/implementation"
      ],
      "words": [
        "support",
        "teams"
      ]
    },
    {
      "interpretation": "Literal shared heading words, not semantic topic equivalence or keyword competition.",
      "truncated": false,
      "urls": [
        "https://northstar.example/product",
        "https://northstar.example/guide"
      ],
      "words": [
        "support"
      ]
    },
    {
      "interpretation": "Literal shared heading words, not semantic topic equivalence or keyword competition.",
      "truncated": false,
      "urls": [
        "https://northstar.example/implementation",
        "https://northstar.example/guide"
      ],
      "words": [
        "scope",
        "support"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "inventory_limits": {},
  "observed_selected_links": [
    {
      "anchor": "Implementation",
      "evidence": {
        "content_hash": "7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b",
        "context": "Implementation Buying guide",
        "context_cues": {
          "condition": [],
          "historical": [],
          "negation": [],
          "package": [],
          "quotation": false,
          "region": []
        },
        "context_truncated": false,
        "excerpt": "Implementation",
        "excerpt_truncated": false,
        "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e nav:nth-of-type(1) \u003e a:nth-of-type(1)",
        "snapshot_ref": "sample-product.json",
        "source_status": "observed",
        "url": "https://northstar.example/product"
      },
      "from": "https://northstar.example/product",
      "to": "https://northstar.example/implementation"
    },
    {
      "anchor": "Buying guide",
      "evidence": {
        "content_hash": "7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b",
        "context": "Implementation Buying guide",
        "context_cues": {
          "condition": [],
          "historical": [],
          "negation": [],
          "package": [],
          "quotation": false,
          "region": []
        },
        "context_truncated": false,
        "excerpt": "Buying guide",
        "excerpt_truncated": false,
        "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e nav:nth-of-type(1) \u003e a:nth-of-type(2)",
        "snapshot_ref": "sample-product.json",
        "source_status": "observed",
        "url": "https://northstar.example/product"
      },
      "from": "https://northstar.example/product",
      "to": "https://northstar.example/guide"
    },
    {
      "anchor": "Workspace plans",
      "evidence": {
        "content_hash": "015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3",
        "context": "Workspace plans",
        "context_cues": {
          "condition": [],
          "historical": [],
          "negation": [],
          "package": [],
          "quotation": false,
          "region": []
        },
        "context_truncated": false,
        "excerpt": "Workspace plans",
        "excerpt_truncated": false,
        "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e nav:nth-of-type(1) \u003e a:nth-of-type(1)",
        "snapshot_ref": "sample-implementation.json",
        "source_status": "observed",
        "url": "https://northstar.example/implementation"
      },
      "from": "https://northstar.example/implementation",
      "to": "https://northstar.example/product"
    },
    {
      "anchor": "self-serve workspace",
      "evidence": {
        "content_hash": "3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0",
        "context": "self-serve workspace assisted implementation",
        "context_cues": {
          "condition": [],
          "historical": [],
          "negation": [],
          "package": [],
          "quotation": false,
          "region": []
        },
        "context_truncated": false,
        "excerpt": "self-serve workspace",
        "excerpt_truncated": false,
        "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(5) \u003e a:nth-of-type(1)",
        "snapshot_ref": "sample-guide.json",
        "source_status": "observed",
        "url": "https://northstar.example/guide"
      },
      "from": "https://northstar.example/guide",
      "to": "https://northstar.example/product"
    },
    {
      "anchor": "assisted implementation",
      "evidence": {
        "content_hash": "3d433d43675f4de3e8228cb4f3bc038cd8b40459d4c6210b4f0cf6d9eb4c3cf0",
        "context": "self-serve workspace assisted implementation",
        "context_cues": {
          "condition": [],
          "historical": [],
          "negation": [],
          "package": [],
          "quotation": false,
          "region": []
        },
        "context_truncated": false,
        "excerpt": "assisted implementation",
        "excerpt_truncated": false,
        "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e article:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(5) \u003e a:nth-of-type(2)",
        "snapshot_ref": "sample-guide.json",
        "source_status": "observed",
        "url": "https://northstar.example/guide"
      },
      "from": "https://northstar.example/guide",
      "to": "https://northstar.example/implementation"
    }
  ],
  "price_difference_candidates": [
    {
      "currency": "USD",
      "evidence": [
        {
          "content_hash": "7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b",
          "context": "Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [
              "per"
            ],
            "historical": [],
            "negation": [],
            "package": [
              "Plan",
              "Starter",
              "plan"
            ],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": [
              "UK",
              "United States"
            ]
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "excerpt": "The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.",
          "excerpt_truncated": false,
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(3)",
          "snapshot_ref": "sample-product.json",
          "source_status": "inferred",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/product"
        },
        {
          "content_hash": "7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b",
          "context": "The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month. The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [
              "per"
            ],
            "historical": [
              "2024",
              "historical"
            ],
            "negation": [
              "no"
            ],
            "package": [
              "Starter",
              "plan"
            ],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": [
              "UK",
              "United States"
            ]
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "excerpt": "The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.",
          "excerpt_truncated": false,
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(4)",
          "snapshot_ref": "sample-product.json",
          "source_status": "inferred",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/product"
        },
        {
          "content_hash": "7dfcae466c6ab25c95ce6fbc7392af5a8a9c929f1ecd4fc1960d002a1c2c528b",
          "context": "The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers. In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available. We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [
              "per"
            ],
            "historical": [
              "2024",
              "historical"
            ],
            "negation": [
              "no",
              "not"
            ],
            "package": [
              "Starter",
              "plan"
            ],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": []
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "excerpt": "In 2024 the Starter plan cost USD 29 per month. That historical offer is no longer available.",
          "excerpt_truncated": false,
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(5)",
          "snapshot_ref": "sample-product.json",
          "source_status": "inferred",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/product"
        },
        {
          "content_hash": "015203067f6a158a2b9e8e752ff488a34bd81cfac01236a3b9daee978c8a83c3",
          "context": "Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review. The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan. A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded.",
          "context_cues": {
            "condition": [
              "from",
              "per"
            ],
            "historical": [],
            "negation": [],
            "package": [
              "Starter",
              "package",
              "plan"
            ],
            "quotation": false,
            "region": []
          },
          "context_truncated": false,
          "excerpt": "The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.",
          "excerpt_truncated": false,
          "selector": "html:nth-of-type(1) \u003e body:nth-of-type(1) \u003e main:nth-of-type(1) \u003e p:nth-of-type(2)",
          "snapshot_ref": "sample-implementation.json",
          "source_status": "inferred",
          "url": "https://northstar.example/implementation"
        }
      ],
      "interpretation": "Different observed amounts; product, region, tier and effective date must be verified before alleging conflict.",
      "left_amounts": [
        "29",
        "39",
        "79"
      ],
      "right_amounts": [
        "99"
      ],
      "urls": [
        "https://northstar.example/product",
        "https://northstar.example/implementation"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "scope": "Only explicitly selected pages and retained raw evidence; never site-wide.",
  "selected_urls": [
    "https://northstar.example/product",
    "https://northstar.example/implementation",
    "https://northstar.example/guide"
  ],
  "usable_urls": [
    "https://northstar.example/product",
    "https://northstar.example/implementation",
    "https://northstar.example/guide"
  ]
}
Page inventories & extraction limits

https://northstar.example/product

Acquisition: available. This inventory describes only what was obtained.

Observed heading outline

  • Text
    Northstar workspace for support teams
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Northstar workspace for support teams Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • US
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    1
  • Text
    What the workspace does
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture. What the workspace does Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • US
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
  • Text
    Plan options
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h4:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner. Plan options The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 3 saved items
    • Plan
    • Starter
    • plan
    Region
    Inspect 2 saved items
    • UK
    • United States
    Condition
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • per
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    4
  • Text
    Evidence behind our claims
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)
    Context
    A fictional reviewer wrote: "We resolved 50% more issues during one trial." This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result. Evidence behind our claims Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • not
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    Yes
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
  • Text
    Before you choose
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)
    Context
    Our benchmark found a 42% improvement in review speed. Source link . Method, sample and test conditions are not described here. Before you choose All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • not
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2

Extraction limits

Body bytes
2097152
Nodes
6000
Depth
64
Headings
80
Paragraphs
120
Links
120
Tables
24
Lists
30
Definitions
30
Dates
60
Claim candidates
80
Entity candidates
120
Additional fields
2 more in the complete saved data below.

https://northstar.example/implementation

Acquisition: available. This inventory describes only what was obtained.

Observed heading outline

  • Text
    A guided setup for small support teams
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    A guided setup for small support teams This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    1
  • Text
    How implementation works
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report. How implementation works Confirm the team, region and intended report. Review a redacted sample export. Agree on acceptance criteria and complete the first review.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
  • Text
    Required preparation
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)
    Context
    A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded. Required preparation All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
  • Text
    Scope and limitations
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)
    Context
    All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data. Scope and limitations Custom integrations and regulatory advice are outside this fictional package. Confirm security requirements with the responsible business owner.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    main
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • package
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2

Extraction limits

Body bytes
2097152
Nodes
6000
Depth
64
Headings
80
Paragraphs
120
Links
120
Tables
24
Lists
30
Definitions
30
Dates
60
Claim candidates
80
Entity candidates
120
Additional fields
2 more in the complete saved data below.

https://northstar.example/guide

Acquisition: available. This inventory describes only what was obtained.

Observed heading outline

  • Text
    How to compare support reporting tools
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    How to compare support reporting tools By Northstar editorial team — fictional author attribution for this simulation.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    article
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    1
  • Text
    Begin with the task
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)
    Context
    This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price. Begin with the task List the decision the report must support, who will use it, and the source of each data field.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    article
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 1 saved items
    • not
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
  • Text
    What should a team verify?
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(2)
    Context
    List the decision the report must support, who will use it, and the source of each data field. What should a team verify? Check sample exports for missing fields. Ask the owner to confirm retention, access and regional requirements.
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    article
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2
  • Text
    Compare the scope
    Selector
    html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(3)
    Context
    Review cycle The interval between collecting a dataset and agreeing on actions. Compare the scope Questions for evaluating a workflow Area Question Ownership Who verifies the output? Limitations Which data is excluded?
    Text truncated
    No
    Context truncated
    No
    Area
    article
    Context cues
    Inspect 6 saved fields
    Negation
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Historical
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Package
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Region
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Condition
    Inspect 0 saved items None recorded in this field
    Quotation
    No
    Source status
    observed
    Level
    2

Extraction limits

Body bytes
2097152
Nodes
6000
Depth
64
Headings
80
Paragraphs
120
Links
120
Tables
24
Lists
30
Definitions
30
Dates
60
Claim candidates
80
Entity candidates
120
Additional fields
2 more in the complete saved data below.

Only selected saved raw HTML was inspected; JavaScript rendering, whole-site analysis and external source verification were not performed.

Observed text, inferred candidates and user-confirmed context are kept separate. Semantic meaning and business truth require owner review.

A matching word, nearby link, date or repeated amount is not proof of answer completeness, source support, staleness or factual conflict.

Extraction is bounded and non-exhaustive; inventories report limits and truncation. Evidence hashes check saved integrity, not source authenticity.

No content change or structure guarantees indexing, AI citation, traffic or revenue.

05 / OPTIONAL AI ANSWER EVIDENCE

What the supplied answers say.

SIMULATED platform scenarios. ChatGPT illustrates a complete plan with failures; Perplexity a fully valid plan; Gemini incomplete citation capture; Claude a partial plan. These differences are fictional test conditions, not measured provider performance. No AI platform was sampled.

Imported answer evidence

USER IMPORT · SOURCE UNVERIFIED

Brand: Northstar · Target domain: northstar.example

Imported 2026-10-11T08:01:00+00:00. Sampling times are shown on each original record below. No platform was sampled automatically.

44Provided records, including retries
38Valid records selected for comparison
4Separate comparison groups
0Duplicate records or retries excluded

Specified samples only. No market exposure, ranking, traffic, or sales conclusion.

How to interpret the evidence
  • These are supplied sample observations, not market exposure, ranking, traffic, or sales.
  • User imports are not authenticated platform records. Hashes detect later changes; they do not prove source authenticity.
  • Import time is not sampling time. English does not establish a US sampling location. API results and native product results remain separate.

A citation marked “yes” was located in the user-supplied original text or JSON. This does not independently authenticate the platform source. A “no” citation result requires the user's complete-capture declaration and no unresolved citation evidence.

Browse supplied questions First 5 of 44 records
QUESTIONS & PLATFORM STATES

Trace the supplied questions.

First 5 of 44 original records

Each row is one supplied record. Question excerpts link to the full original question, answer and sampling conditions. Matching questions across different platforms or modes are not combined.

Continue to the remaining original records ↗
Geminiweb_search · non branded commercial10 valid · 2 failed
10/12 valid / planned
4 citation unknown

Sample group 1 · Gemini

Provider: Google. These conditions apply only to this group.

Sampling conditions
Model
not_disclosed
Language / region
en-GB / GB
Region basis
SIMULATED FIXTURE: GB is a test label; no location or account region was observed.
Other conditions
personalization: unknownsigned_in: Falsesimulation: True
10 valid selected records 2 selected failed runs 12 provided records 10 / 12 valid / planned · 83.33% coverage

All 12 expected runs are represented, including any failed runs. Failed runs remain visible and do not enter metric denominators.

Brand text mention

30.00%

3 / 10 positive / judgeable

Complete plan · valid records

Original-source target citation

33.33%

2 / 6 positive / judgeable

Judgeable subset only
Full denominators & judgeable coverage

Scroll horizontally if needed. Focus the table and use the arrow keys to reach every column.

ObservationPositive / judgeableSample ratioJudgeable / validJudgeable / planned coverage
Brand text mentionComplete plan; valid records3 / 1030.00%10 / 10100.00%83.33%
Target-domain citation located in supplied originalJudgeable subset only2 / 633.33%6 / 1060.00%50.00%

The two metrics can have different denominators. Unknown citation evidence is excluded from the citation denominator, never counted as “no.” A zero denominator is not shown as 0%.

Record IDs in this group

sim-varied-gemini-r1 · sim-varied-gemini-r2 · sim-varied-gemini-r3 · sim-varied-gemini-r4 · sim-varied-gemini-r5 · sim-varied-gemini-r6 · sim-varied-gemini-r7 · sim-varied-gemini-r8 · sim-varied-gemini-r9 · sim-varied-gemini-r10 · sim-varied-gemini-r11 · sim-varied-gemini-r12

Claudeplain_chat · branded6 valid · 2 failed
Incomplete plan · 8/12 runs

Sample group 2 · Claude

Provider: Anthropic. These conditions apply only to this group.

Sampling conditions
Model
not_disclosed
Language / region
en-US / US
Region basis
SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Other conditions
personalization: unknownsigned_in: Falsesimulation: True
6 valid selected records 2 selected failed runs 8 provided records 6 / 12 valid / planned · 50.00% coverage

Incomplete plan: 8 of 12 expected runs are represented. Ratios below describe only the judgeable subset.

Brand text mention

33.33%

2 / 6 positive / judgeable

Judgeable subset only

Original-source target citation

0.00%

0 / 6 positive / judgeable

Judgeable subset only
Full denominators & judgeable coverage

Scroll horizontally if needed. Focus the table and use the arrow keys to reach every column.

ObservationPositive / judgeableSample ratioJudgeable / validJudgeable / planned coverage
Brand text mentionJudgeable subset only2 / 633.33%6 / 6100.00%50.00%
Target-domain citation located in supplied originalJudgeable subset only0 / 60.00%6 / 6100.00%50.00%

The two metrics can have different denominators. Unknown citation evidence is excluded from the citation denominator, never counted as “no.” A zero denominator is not shown as 0%.

Record IDs in this group

sim-varied-claude-r1 · sim-varied-claude-r2 · sim-varied-claude-r3 · sim-varied-claude-r4 · sim-varied-claude-r5 · sim-varied-claude-r6 · sim-varied-claude-r7 · sim-varied-claude-r8

ChatGPTweb_search · non branded commercial10 valid · 2 failed
10/12 valid / planned

Sample group 3 · ChatGPT

Provider: OpenAI. These conditions apply only to this group.

Sampling conditions
Model
not_disclosed
Language / region
en-US / US
Region basis
SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Other conditions
personalization: unknownsigned_in: Falsesimulation: True
10 valid selected records 2 selected failed runs 12 provided records 10 / 12 valid / planned · 83.33% coverage

All 12 expected runs are represented, including any failed runs. Failed runs remain visible and do not enter metric denominators.

Brand text mention

30.00%

3 / 10 positive / judgeable

Complete plan · valid records

Original-source target citation

20.00%

2 / 10 positive / judgeable

Complete plan · valid records
Full denominators & judgeable coverage

Scroll horizontally if needed. Focus the table and use the arrow keys to reach every column.

ObservationPositive / judgeableSample ratioJudgeable / validJudgeable / planned coverage
Brand text mentionComplete plan; valid records3 / 1030.00%10 / 10100.00%83.33%
Target-domain citation located in supplied originalComplete plan; valid records2 / 1020.00%10 / 10100.00%83.33%

The two metrics can have different denominators. Unknown citation evidence is excluded from the citation denominator, never counted as “no.” A zero denominator is not shown as 0%.

Record IDs in this group

sim-varied-chatgpt-r1 · sim-varied-chatgpt-r2 · sim-varied-chatgpt-r3 · sim-varied-chatgpt-r4 · sim-varied-chatgpt-r5 · sim-varied-chatgpt-r6 · sim-varied-chatgpt-r7 · sim-varied-chatgpt-r8 · sim-varied-chatgpt-r9 · sim-varied-chatgpt-r10 · sim-varied-chatgpt-r11 · sim-varied-chatgpt-r12

Perplexityweb_search · non branded commercial12 valid · 0 failed
12/12 valid / planned

Sample group 4 · Perplexity

Provider: Perplexity. These conditions apply only to this group.

Sampling conditions
Model
not_disclosed
Language / region
en-US / US
Region basis
SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Other conditions
personalization: unknownsigned_in: Falsesimulation: True
12 valid selected records 0 selected failed runs 12 provided records 12 / 12 valid / planned · 100.00% coverage

All 12 expected runs are represented, including any failed runs. Failed runs remain visible and do not enter metric denominators.

Brand text mention

58.33%

7 / 12 positive / judgeable

Complete plan · valid records

Original-source target citation

41.67%

5 / 12 positive / judgeable

Complete plan · valid records
Full denominators & judgeable coverage

Scroll horizontally if needed. Focus the table and use the arrow keys to reach every column.

ObservationPositive / judgeableSample ratioJudgeable / validJudgeable / planned coverage
Brand text mentionComplete plan; valid records7 / 1258.33%12 / 12100.00%100.00%
Target-domain citation located in supplied originalComplete plan; valid records5 / 1241.67%12 / 12100.00%100.00%

The two metrics can have different denominators. Unknown citation evidence is excluded from the citation denominator, never counted as “no.” A zero denominator is not shown as 0%.

Record IDs in this group

sim-varied-perplexity-r1 · sim-varied-perplexity-r2 · sim-varied-perplexity-r3 · sim-varied-perplexity-r4 · sim-varied-perplexity-r5 · sim-varied-perplexity-r6 · sim-varied-perplexity-r7 · sim-varied-perplexity-r8 · sim-varied-perplexity-r9 · sim-varied-perplexity-r10 · sim-varied-perplexity-r11 · sim-varied-perplexity-r12

All original records · 44

Trace each original record

Expand a record to inspect its original question, answer, citation locations, sampling metadata, and denominator decision. Raw text is displayed as data and is not executed.

sim-varied-chatgpt-r1successMention: yes · Citation: yesSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for ChatGPT; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 12 supplied, 10 valid, 2 simulated failures.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
OpenAI · ChatGPT · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-chatgpt-p1 / sim-varied-chatgpt-run1
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website audit. [Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
Yes. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
https://northstar.example/methodraw answer link
Original character positions: 36–78
[Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
315c84509efa2eb36d8378cfe81c268a87d107cbb9016fb3508ec5180c4321e3Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-chatgpt-r2successMention: yes · Citation: yesSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for ChatGPT; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 12 supplied, 10 valid, 2 simulated failures.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
OpenAI · ChatGPT · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-chatgpt-p1 / sim-varied-chatgpt-run2
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website audit. [Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
Yes. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
https://northstar.example/methodraw answer link
Original character positions: 36–78
[Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
315c84509efa2eb36d8378cfe81c268a87d107cbb9016fb3508ec5180c4321e3Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-chatgpt-r3successMention: yes · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for ChatGPT; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 12 supplied, 10 valid, 2 simulated failures.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
OpenAI · ChatGPT · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-chatgpt-p1 / sim-varied-chatgpt-run3
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website audit.
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
687b5ac446a55d8e5c5a25e52f5f604de426f38162daadaa36f93b509991f3a9Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-chatgpt-r4successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for ChatGPT; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 12 supplied, 10 valid, 2 simulated failures.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
OpenAI · ChatGPT · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-chatgpt-p1 / sim-varied-chatgpt-run4
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-chatgpt-r5successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for ChatGPT; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 12 supplied, 10 valid, 2 simulated failures.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
OpenAI · ChatGPT · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-chatgpt-p1 / sim-varied-chatgpt-run5
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-chatgpt-r6successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for ChatGPT; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 12 supplied, 10 valid, 2 simulated failures.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
OpenAI · ChatGPT · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-chatgpt-p1 / sim-varied-chatgpt-run6
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-chatgpt-r7successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for ChatGPT; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 12 supplied, 10 valid, 2 simulated failures.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
OpenAI · ChatGPT · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-chatgpt-p1 / sim-varied-chatgpt-run7
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-chatgpt-r8successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for ChatGPT; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 12 supplied, 10 valid, 2 simulated failures.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
OpenAI · ChatGPT · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-chatgpt-p1 / sim-varied-chatgpt-run8
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-chatgpt-r9successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for ChatGPT; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 12 supplied, 10 valid, 2 simulated failures.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
OpenAI · ChatGPT · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-chatgpt-p1 / sim-varied-chatgpt-run9
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-chatgpt-r10successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for ChatGPT; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 12 supplied, 10 valid, 2 simulated failures.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
OpenAI · ChatGPT · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-chatgpt-p1 / sim-varied-chatgpt-run10
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-chatgpt-r11failedMention: unknown · Citation: unknownExcluded from denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for ChatGPT; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 12 supplied, 10 valid, 2 simulated failures.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
OpenAI · ChatGPT · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-chatgpt-p1 / sim-varied-chatgpt-run11
Denominator decision
Excluded: failed.
Recorded failure
SIMULATED provider timeout; no platform request occurred
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
No successful answer was provided.
Brand text mention
Unknown. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
Unknown. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-chatgpt-r12failedMention: unknown · Citation: unknownExcluded from denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for ChatGPT; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 12 supplied, 10 valid, 2 simulated failures.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
OpenAI · ChatGPT · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-chatgpt-p1 / sim-varied-chatgpt-run12
Denominator decision
Excluded: failed.
Recorded failure
SIMULATED provider timeout; no platform request occurred
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
No successful answer was provided.
Brand text mention
Unknown. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
Unknown. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-perplexity-r1successMention: yes · Citation: yesSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Perplexity; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: all 12 supplied and valid; different simulated answer text.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Perplexity · Perplexity · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-perplexity-p1 / sim-varied-perplexity-run1
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website evidence audit. [Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
Yes. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
https://northstar.example/methodraw answer link
Original character positions: 45–87
[Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
febb15bb65d948e17a1dccb3b9f32aed3ecc97070c2db5a8f1a9bec496bcd852Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-perplexity-r2successMention: yes · Citation: yesSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Perplexity; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: all 12 supplied and valid; different simulated answer text.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Perplexity · Perplexity · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-perplexity-p1 / sim-varied-perplexity-run2
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website evidence audit. [Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
Yes. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
https://northstar.example/methodraw answer link
Original character positions: 45–87
[Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
febb15bb65d948e17a1dccb3b9f32aed3ecc97070c2db5a8f1a9bec496bcd852Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-perplexity-r3successMention: yes · Citation: yesSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Perplexity; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: all 12 supplied and valid; different simulated answer text.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Perplexity · Perplexity · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-perplexity-p1 / sim-varied-perplexity-run3
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website evidence audit. [Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
Yes. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
https://northstar.example/methodraw answer link
Original character positions: 45–87
[Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
febb15bb65d948e17a1dccb3b9f32aed3ecc97070c2db5a8f1a9bec496bcd852Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-perplexity-r4successMention: yes · Citation: yesSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Perplexity; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: all 12 supplied and valid; different simulated answer text.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Perplexity · Perplexity · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-perplexity-p1 / sim-varied-perplexity-run4
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website evidence audit. [Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
Yes. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
https://northstar.example/methodraw answer link
Original character positions: 45–87
[Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
febb15bb65d948e17a1dccb3b9f32aed3ecc97070c2db5a8f1a9bec496bcd852Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-perplexity-r5successMention: yes · Citation: yesSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Perplexity; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: all 12 supplied and valid; different simulated answer text.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Perplexity · Perplexity · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-perplexity-p1 / sim-varied-perplexity-run5
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website evidence audit. [Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
Yes. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
https://northstar.example/methodraw answer link
Original character positions: 45–87
[Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
febb15bb65d948e17a1dccb3b9f32aed3ecc97070c2db5a8f1a9bec496bcd852Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-perplexity-r6successMention: yes · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Perplexity; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: all 12 supplied and valid; different simulated answer text.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Perplexity · Perplexity · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-perplexity-p1 / sim-varied-perplexity-run6
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website evidence audit.
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
cea707ffee55e7a189867bef1e79347a80d5f58d25f17e7d517aa9227ff6fd74Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-perplexity-r7successMention: yes · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Perplexity; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: all 12 supplied and valid; different simulated answer text.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Perplexity · Perplexity · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-perplexity-p1 / sim-varied-perplexity-run7
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website evidence audit.
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
cea707ffee55e7a189867bef1e79347a80d5f58d25f17e7d517aa9227ff6fd74Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-perplexity-r8successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Perplexity; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: all 12 supplied and valid; different simulated answer text.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Perplexity · Perplexity · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-perplexity-p1 / sim-varied-perplexity-run8
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Other approaches are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
01c1d523d2152aafa8ee0e28d2f9bab367d3f4c78bab0504e59a13cb7e3808beDetects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-perplexity-r9successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Perplexity; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: all 12 supplied and valid; different simulated answer text.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Perplexity · Perplexity · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-perplexity-p1 / sim-varied-perplexity-run9
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Other approaches are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
01c1d523d2152aafa8ee0e28d2f9bab367d3f4c78bab0504e59a13cb7e3808beDetects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-perplexity-r10successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Perplexity; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: all 12 supplied and valid; different simulated answer text.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Perplexity · Perplexity · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-perplexity-p1 / sim-varied-perplexity-run10
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Other approaches are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
01c1d523d2152aafa8ee0e28d2f9bab367d3f4c78bab0504e59a13cb7e3808beDetects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-perplexity-r11successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Perplexity; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: all 12 supplied and valid; different simulated answer text.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Perplexity · Perplexity · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-perplexity-p1 / sim-varied-perplexity-run11
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Other approaches are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
01c1d523d2152aafa8ee0e28d2f9bab367d3f4c78bab0504e59a13cb7e3808beDetects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-perplexity-r12successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Perplexity; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: all 12 supplied and valid; different simulated answer text.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Perplexity · Perplexity · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-perplexity-p1 / sim-varied-perplexity-run12
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small brand?
Original answer
Other approaches are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
01c1d523d2152aafa8ee0e28d2f9bab367d3f4c78bab0504e59a13cb7e3808beDetects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-gemini-r1successMention: yes · Citation: yesSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Gemini; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 10 valid; 4 valid records have incomplete original citation capture. Citation ratio describes only 6 judgeable records.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Google · Gemini · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
GB · SIMULATED FIXTURE: GB is a test label; no location or account region was observed.
Language: en-GB
Plan / run
sim-varied-gemini-p1 / sim-varied-gemini-run1
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small UK brand?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website audit. [Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
Yes. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
https://northstar.example/methodraw answer link
Original character positions: 36–78
[Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
315c84509efa2eb36d8378cfe81c268a87d107cbb9016fb3508ec5180c4321e3Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-gemini-r2successMention: yes · Citation: yesSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Gemini; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 10 valid; 4 valid records have incomplete original citation capture. Citation ratio describes only 6 judgeable records.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Google · Gemini · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
GB · SIMULATED FIXTURE: GB is a test label; no location or account region was observed.
Language: en-GB
Plan / run
sim-varied-gemini-p1 / sim-varied-gemini-run2
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small UK brand?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website audit. [Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
Yes. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
https://northstar.example/methodraw answer link
Original character positions: 36–78
[Source](https://northstar.example/method)
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
315c84509efa2eb36d8378cfe81c268a87d107cbb9016fb3508ec5180c4321e3Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-gemini-r3successMention: yes · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Gemini; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 10 valid; 4 valid records have incomplete original citation capture. Citation ratio describes only 6 judgeable records.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Google · Gemini · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
GB · SIMULATED FIXTURE: GB is a test label; no location or account region was observed.
Language: en-GB
Plan / run
sim-varied-gemini-p1 / sim-varied-gemini-run3
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small UK brand?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website audit.
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
687b5ac446a55d8e5c5a25e52f5f604de426f38162daadaa36f93b509991f3a9Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-gemini-r4successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Gemini; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 10 valid; 4 valid records have incomplete original citation capture. Citation ratio describes only 6 judgeable records.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Google · Gemini · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
GB · SIMULATED FIXTURE: GB is a test label; no location or account region was observed.
Language: en-GB
Plan / run
sim-varied-gemini-p1 / sim-varied-gemini-run4
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small UK brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-gemini-r5successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Gemini; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 10 valid; 4 valid records have incomplete original citation capture. Citation ratio describes only 6 judgeable records.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Google · Gemini · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
GB · SIMULATED FIXTURE: GB is a test label; no location or account region was observed.
Language: en-GB
Plan / run
sim-varied-gemini-p1 / sim-varied-gemini-run5
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small UK brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-gemini-r6successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Gemini; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 10 valid; 4 valid records have incomplete original citation capture. Citation ratio describes only 6 judgeable records.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Google · Gemini · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
GB · SIMULATED FIXTURE: GB is a test label; no location or account region was observed.
Language: en-GB
Plan / run
sim-varied-gemini-p1 / sim-varied-gemini-run6
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small UK brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-gemini-r7successMention: no · Citation: unknownSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Gemini; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 10 valid; 4 valid records have incomplete original citation capture. Citation ratio describes only 6 judgeable records.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Google · Gemini · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
GB · SIMULATED FIXTURE: GB is a test label; no location or account region was observed.
Language: en-GB
Plan / run
sim-varied-gemini-p1 / sim-varied-gemini-run7
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small UK brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
Unknown. Capture completeness: not provided.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-gemini-r8successMention: no · Citation: unknownSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Gemini; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 10 valid; 4 valid records have incomplete original citation capture. Citation ratio describes only 6 judgeable records.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Google · Gemini · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
GB · SIMULATED FIXTURE: GB is a test label; no location or account region was observed.
Language: en-GB
Plan / run
sim-varied-gemini-p1 / sim-varied-gemini-run8
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small UK brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
Unknown. Capture completeness: not provided.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-gemini-r9successMention: no · Citation: unknownSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Gemini; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 10 valid; 4 valid records have incomplete original citation capture. Citation ratio describes only 6 judgeable records.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Google · Gemini · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
GB · SIMULATED FIXTURE: GB is a test label; no location or account region was observed.
Language: en-GB
Plan / run
sim-varied-gemini-p1 / sim-varied-gemini-run9
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small UK brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
Unknown. Capture completeness: not provided.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-gemini-r10successMention: no · Citation: unknownSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Gemini; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 10 valid; 4 valid records have incomplete original citation capture. Citation ratio describes only 6 judgeable records.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Google · Gemini · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
GB · SIMULATED FIXTURE: GB is a test label; no location or account region was observed.
Language: en-GB
Plan / run
sim-varied-gemini-p1 / sim-varied-gemini-run10
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
Which audit helps a small UK brand?
Original answer
Other tools are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
Unknown. Capture completeness: not provided.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
708721fed867d05ed0c0c4d820366a252783a9096e8ac1ac8de2e78ccea27f86Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-gemini-r11failedMention: unknown · Citation: unknownExcluded from denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Gemini; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 10 valid; 4 valid records have incomplete original citation capture. Citation ratio describes only 6 judgeable records.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Google · Gemini · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
GB · SIMULATED FIXTURE: GB is a test label; no location or account region was observed.
Language: en-GB
Plan / run
sim-varied-gemini-p1 / sim-varied-gemini-run11
Denominator decision
Excluded: failed.
Recorded failure
SIMULATED provider timeout; no platform request occurred
Original question
Which audit helps a small UK brand?
Original answer
No successful answer was provided.
Brand text mention
Unknown. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
Unknown. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-gemini-r12failedMention: unknown · Citation: unknownExcluded from denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Gemini; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Complete plan: 10 valid; 4 valid records have incomplete original citation capture. Citation ratio describes only 6 judgeable records.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Google · Gemini · web_search
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
GB · SIMULATED FIXTURE: GB is a test label; no location or account region was observed.
Language: en-GB
Plan / run
sim-varied-gemini-p1 / sim-varied-gemini-run12
Denominator decision
Excluded: failed.
Recorded failure
SIMULATED provider timeout; no platform request occurred
Original question
Which audit helps a small UK brand?
Original answer
No successful answer was provided.
Brand text mention
Unknown. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
Unknown. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-claude-r1successMention: yes · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Claude; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Incomplete plan: 8 of 12 planned records supplied; 6 valid, 2 failures. Ratios describe the judgeable subset, not the whole plan.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Anthropic · Claude · plain_chat
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-claude-p1 / sim-varied-claude-run1
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
What does Northstar's audit include?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website evidence audit.
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
cea707ffee55e7a189867bef1e79347a80d5f58d25f17e7d517aa9227ff6fd74Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-claude-r2successMention: yes · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Claude; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Incomplete plan: 8 of 12 planned records supplied; 6 valid, 2 failures. Ratios describe the judgeable subset, not the whole plan.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Anthropic · Claude · plain_chat
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-claude-p1 / sim-varied-claude-run2
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
What does Northstar's audit include?
Original answer
Northstar provides a website evidence audit.
Brand text mention
Yes. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Original answer character positions 0–9 (end exclusive).
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
cea707ffee55e7a189867bef1e79347a80d5f58d25f17e7d517aa9227ff6fd74Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-claude-r3successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Claude; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Incomplete plan: 8 of 12 planned records supplied; 6 valid, 2 failures. Ratios describe the judgeable subset, not the whole plan.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Anthropic · Claude · plain_chat
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-claude-p1 / sim-varied-claude-run3
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
What does Northstar's audit include?
Original answer
Other approaches are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
01c1d523d2152aafa8ee0e28d2f9bab367d3f4c78bab0504e59a13cb7e3808beDetects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-claude-r4successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Claude; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Incomplete plan: 8 of 12 planned records supplied; 6 valid, 2 failures. Ratios describe the judgeable subset, not the whole plan.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Anthropic · Claude · plain_chat
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-claude-p1 / sim-varied-claude-run4
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
What does Northstar's audit include?
Original answer
Other approaches are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
01c1d523d2152aafa8ee0e28d2f9bab367d3f4c78bab0504e59a13cb7e3808beDetects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-claude-r5successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Claude; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Incomplete plan: 8 of 12 planned records supplied; 6 valid, 2 failures. Ratios describe the judgeable subset, not the whole plan.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Anthropic · Claude · plain_chat
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-claude-p1 / sim-varied-claude-run5
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
What does Northstar's audit include?
Original answer
Other approaches are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
01c1d523d2152aafa8ee0e28d2f9bab367d3f4c78bab0504e59a13cb7e3808beDetects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-claude-r6successMention: no · Citation: noSelected record; see metric denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Claude; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Incomplete plan: 8 of 12 planned records supplied; 6 valid, 2 failures. Ratios describe the judgeable subset, not the whole plan.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Anthropic · Claude · plain_chat
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-claude-p1 / sim-varied-claude-run6
Denominator decision
Selected valid record. Each metric still requires its own judgeable evidence.
Original question
What does Northstar's audit include?
Original answer
Other approaches are available.
Brand text mention
No. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
No. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
01c1d523d2152aafa8ee0e28d2f9bab367d3f4c78bab0504e59a13cb7e3808beDetects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-claude-r7failedMention: unknown · Citation: unknownExcluded from denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Claude; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Incomplete plan: 8 of 12 planned records supplied; 6 valid, 2 failures. Ratios describe the judgeable subset, not the whole plan.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Anthropic · Claude · plain_chat
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-claude-p1 / sim-varied-claude-run7
Denominator decision
Excluded: failed.
Recorded failure
SIMULATED timeout; no platform request occurred
Original question
What does Northstar's audit include?
Original answer
No successful answer was provided.
Brand text mention
Unknown. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
Unknown. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
sim-varied-claude-r8failedMention: unknown · Citation: unknownExcluded from denominator
Sampling time
2026-10-11T08:00:00Z
Source / integrity
SIMULATED TEST RECORD for Claude; no platform was sampled. Provider, mode, model, region and timestamps are fixture labels. Incomplete plan: 8 of 12 planned records supplied; 6 valid, 2 failures. Ratios describe the judgeable subset, not the whole plan.
User import · unverified source integrity
Product / mode
Anthropic · Claude · plain_chat
Model: not_disclosed
Region / basis
US · SIMULATED FIXTURE: US is a test label; no physical location or account region was observed.
Language: en-US
Plan / run
sim-varied-claude-p1 / sim-varied-claude-run8
Denominator decision
Excluded: failed.
Recorded failure
SIMULATED timeout; no platform request occurred
Original question
What does Northstar's audit include?
Original answer
No successful answer was provided.
Brand text mention
Unknown. Literal, case-insensitive matching; URL substrings excluded.
Target-domain citation
Unknown. Capture completeness: user declared complete.
0 unresolved source entries; 0 later-supplied URLs.
Located original citations
No citation was located in a supported original-source representation. This alone does not establish that the answer had no citations.
Third-party brand citation
Unknown. A third-party URL alone does not prove that its source discusses the brand; source context has not been checked.
Brand fact conflict
Needs review. No confirmed business-fact baseline and source-context review has been applied.
Answer SHA-256
e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855Detects later changes to the saved answer. Does not prove source authenticity.
06 / ACTION HANDOFF

A brief for the right owner.

Changes, owners and acceptance checks in one table.

Open the full action handoff 35 tasks

Scroll horizontally if needed. Focus the table and use the arrow keys to reach every column.

Priority / statusEvidence & next actionOwner & dependenciesAcceptance check
P2failR06 · Repair the invalid JSON-LD block

Locate JSON-LD block 1 in the saved script (raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]). Recorded parser/shape issue: JSONDecodeError. Repair the indicated block and verify its facts.

https://northstar.example/product
Evidence location

raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json]

{'blocks': 1, 'types': [], 'errors': [{'block': 0, 'error': 'JSONDecodeError'}], 'duplicate_keys': [], 'same_id_differences': [], 'traversal_limited': False}
Developer

Confirm page intent and locate the responsible CMS/template setting before editing.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-fetch this exact URL and parse the corrected JSON-LD block 1; verify the recorded error is absent and retained JSON-LD types remain intentional. Repeat the same selected URL with rule R06 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: script[type=application/ld+json].
P2failR08 · Add a document title for this page

Confirm page purpose and locate title/H1/language configuration; add an accurate title if missing.

https://northstar.example/product
Evidence location

raw_html: title, h1, html[lang]

{'titles': [], 'h1': ['Northstar workspace for support teams'], 'lang': 'en-US', 'raw_text_chars': 1408, 'possible_js_shell': False}
Content editor

Confirm page intent and locate the responsible CMS/template setting before editing.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R08 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: title, h1, html[lang].
P2needs reviewC03 · Check the specific heading transitions and repeated passages

Compare the cited headings with their section relationship. Change the level only if it misrepresents that relationship. For repeated text, document its purpose; remove or consolidate only unnecessary repetition.

https://northstar.example/product
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)

What the workspace does

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h4:nth-of-type(1)

Plan options
Content editor / business owner

Editor confirms section nesting and whether reuse is intentional.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

The editor records a decision for each cited transition/reuse. Re-extraction matches the intended outline and any retained repetition has an explanation.
P2needs reviewC04 · Reconcile the cited amounts under matching offer conditions

For each cited amount, record product/variant, package, region and effective date. Compare only matching offers with the owner's dated price record; correct or qualify text only after confirming a mismatch.

https://northstar.example/product
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)

Northstar is a fictional shared workspace for small US customer support teams comparing their next reporting tool. This is a simulated audit fixture.

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)

The Starter plan costs USD 39 per month for teams in the United States. The UK Starter plan costs GBP 35 per month.
Business owner / content editor

Business owner supplies dated offer facts; editor preserves negation, quotation and historical context.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Each compared statement has an offer/region/date label and an authoritative record; any verified conflict is corrected, or the legitimate difference is documented.
P2needs reviewC05 · Verify the source behind these exact claim candidates

Open the cited passage in context. Identify claim ownership, then record the original source and exact supporting passage, date, method and conditions. Qualify or remove the claim only if that review establishes a problem.

https://northstar.example/guide
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)

There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.
Content editor / business owner

Claim owner supplies the original supporting source; editor verifies quotations, denials and historical context.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

The reviewer records a support decision, source passage and applicable conditions for each candidate. Unsupported wording is corrected with owner approval.
P2needs reviewC05 · Verify the source behind these exact claim candidates

Open the cited passage in context. Identify claim ownership, then record the original source and exact supporting passage, date, method and conditions. Qualify or remove the claim only if that review establishes a problem.

https://northstar.example/product
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(6)

We do not guarantee a 50% reduction in response time.

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > blockquote:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)

A fictional reviewer wrote: "We resolved 50% more issues during one trial." This is a quotation for review, not a verified customer result.
Content editor / business owner

Claim owner supplies the original supporting source; editor verifies quotations, denials and historical context.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

The reviewer records a support decision, source passage and applicable conditions for each candidate. Unsupported wording is corrected with owner approval.
P3needs reviewC06 · Check whether these excerpts identify their subject and fields

Read the cited excerpt with and without its preceding passage. If the subject or necessary condition is ambiguous, name it beside the answer. For a genuine data table, confirm and label the fields; do not add a table just to satisfy a format.

https://northstar.example/guide
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)

This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.
Content editor / business owner

Content owner confirms the intended meaning and conditions.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

An editor can identify the subject, field meaning and necessary limits without inventing context; intentional structures are documented.
P3needs reviewC06 · Check whether these excerpts identify their subject and fields

Read the cited excerpt with and without its preceding passage. If the subject or necessary condition is ambiguous, name it beside the answer. For a genuine data table, confirm and label the fields; do not add a table just to satisfy a format.

https://northstar.example/implementation
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)

This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.
Content editor / business owner

Content owner confirms the intended meaning and conditions.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

An editor can identify the subject, field meaning and necessary limits without inventing context; intentional structures are documented.
P3needs reviewC06 · Check whether these excerpts identify their subject and fields

Read the cited excerpt with and without its preceding passage. If the subject or necessary condition is ambiguous, name it beside the answer. For a genuine data table, confirm and label the fields; do not add a table just to satisfy a format.

https://northstar.example/product
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > table:nth-of-type(1)

Plan comparison Starter Team One reviewer Five reviewers

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(10)

This makes it easier. It works with the process above.
Content editor / business owner

Content owner confirms the intended meaning and conditions.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

An editor can identify the subject, field meaning and necessary limits without inventing context; intentional structures are documented.
P3needs reviewC07 · Verify the decision information behind the observed links

Confirm which terms the visitor needs, then explicitly select the relevant same-site destination within the five-page limit. Compare its exact wording with the owner's current policy before changing this page or its link label.

https://northstar.example/implementation
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)

Discuss your setup → https://northstar.example/contact
Content editor / business owner

Business owner confirms applicable policies and audience; editor selects the destination for evidence review.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

The relevant destination has saved evidence and owner-confirmed applicable terms; the link label describes that destination accurately, or a reason for retaining it is recorded.
P3needs reviewC07 · Verify the decision information behind the observed links

Confirm which terms the visitor needs, then explicitly select the relevant same-site destination within the five-page limit. Compare its exact wording with the owner's current policy before changing this page or its link label.

https://northstar.example/product
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(1)

Request a plan review → https://northstar.example/contact

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > footer:nth-of-type(1) > a:nth-of-type(2)

Contact Northstar → mailto:help@northstar.example
Content editor / business owner

Business owner confirms applicable policies and audience; editor selects the destination for evidence review.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

The relevant destination has saved evidence and owner-confirmed applicable terms; the link label describes that destination accurately, or a reason for retaining it is recorded.
P3needs reviewC02 · Map the confirmed questions to complete answer passages

For each confirmed question, identify the exact answer passage, its supporting facts and necessary conditions; add content only after the owner confirms a real gap.

https://northstar.example/guide
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)

This guide helps an operations manager compare whether a reporting workflow meets the team's needs. The article does not offer a purchase price.

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(5)

There is no single best tool for every team. Compare a self-serve workspace with assisted implementation only after confirming the task.
Content editor / business owner

Owner confirms necessary answer facts; editor verifies the candidate passages.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

For every confirmed question, record the complete answer, necessary conditions and support, or an owner-confirmed gap to address.
P3needs reviewC02 · Map the confirmed questions to complete answer passages

For each confirmed question, identify the exact answer passage, its supporting facts and necessary conditions; add content only after the owner confirms a real gap.

https://northstar.example/implementation
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(1)

This fictional implementation service helps an operations manager prepare data, agree on review responsibilities, and validate the first weekly report.

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)

The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.
Content editor / business owner

Owner confirms necessary answer facts; editor verifies the candidate passages.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

For every confirmed question, record the complete answer, necessary conditions and support, or an owner-confirmed gap to address.
P3needs reviewC02 · Map the confirmed questions to complete answer passages

For each confirmed question, identify the exact answer passage, its supporting facts and necessary conditions; add content only after the owner confirms a real gap.

https://northstar.example/product
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4)

The Team plan costs USD 79 per month and includes five reviewers.

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)

Combine an uploaded weekly ticket export with a team review checklist. Managers can compare open issues and assign an owner.
Content editor / business owner

Owner confirms necessary answer facts; editor verifies the candidate passages.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

For every confirmed question, record the complete answer, necessary conditions and support, or an owner-confirmed gap to address.
P3needs reviewC01 · Purpose and audience

Confirm the intended visitor, page type and task, then compare the title, opening passage and primary action to that brief; revise only an observed mismatch.

https://northstar.example/guide
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > title:nth-of-type(1)

How to compare support reporting tools

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)

How to compare support reporting tools
Content editor / business owner

Confirm page intent and locate the applicable CMS setting or passage before editing.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-run C01 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.
P3needs reviewC03 · Organization and clarity

Review the listed heading transitions and repeated passages; retain intentional policy/boilerplate reuse. Replace a flagged stock phrase only with a more specific supported explanation.

https://northstar.example/guide
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)

How to compare support reporting tools

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > article:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)

Begin with the task
Content editor / business owner

Audience familiarity and reason for intentional repeated content

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-run C03 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.
P3needs reviewC04 · Entities and factual context

Ask the owner to verify the cited amount, specification, delivery and region statements against dated authoritative facts. Compare the same offer and conditions; preserve quotation, negation, historical and package context.

https://northstar.example/guide
Evidence location

saved response envelope; content acquisition state

Retained 0 entity/fact candidates and 0 currency groups with differing amounts. These are comparison candidates, not confirmed business conflicts.
Business owner / content editor

Dated authoritative offer/specification/policy facts and applicable region or package

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-run C04 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.
P3needs reviewC07 · Decision and trust information

Confirm which decision and trust information this page needs, locate it in the supplied evidence or explicitly select its destination, and add a useful contextual link only after verifying the underlying information.

https://northstar.example/guide
Evidence location

saved response envelope; content acquisition state

Observed 0 contact/policy/about/source navigation candidates and 0 byline annotations in this retained page inventory; factual credibility was not established.
Content editor / business owner

Applicable decision requirements and authoritative identity/policy sources

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-run C07 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.
P3needs reviewC08 · Dates and maintenance

Ask the owner what each published, updated and body date means. Check whether time-sensitive facts remain correct using their original sources; change dates only to reflect a real, verified event.

https://northstar.example/guide
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(1)

2025-04-15

html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(2)

2026-08-01
Content editor / business owner

Editorial date meaning and authoritative sources for time-sensitive facts

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-run C08 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.
P3needs reviewR05 · Canonical declarations

Confirm the intended URL, locate the canonical configuration and remove conflicting or invalid declarations.

https://northstar.example/guide
Evidence location

raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link

{'declarations': [], 'resolved': [], 'base_url': 'https://northstar.example/guide', 'http_link': ''}
Developer

Confirm page intent and locate the applicable CMS setting or passage before editing.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R05 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: link[rel=canonical], base[href]; response.headers.link.
P3not runR07 · Raw and rendered content

If needed, authorize controlled rendering with the same network protections and preserve both snapshots.

https://northstar.example/guide
Evidence location

raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1)

{'rendered': False, 'raw_noindex': False, 'dom_differs': None, 'rendered_snapshot_ref': None}
Developer

Confirm page intent and locate the applicable CMS setting or passage before editing.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R07 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1).
P3needs reviewR10 · Confirmed business facts

Verify the business source/date, reconcile the quoted conflicting phrase and review context.

https://northstar.example/guide
Evidence location

raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts

[]
Business owner

Confirm page intent and locate the applicable CMS setting or passage before editing.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R10 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts.
P3needs reviewC01 · Purpose and audience

Confirm the intended visitor, page type and task, then compare the title, opening passage and primary action to that brief; revise only an observed mismatch.

https://northstar.example/implementation
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > title:nth-of-type(1)

Northstar implementation service

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)

A guided setup for small support teams
Content editor / business owner

Confirm page intent and locate the applicable CMS setting or passage before editing.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-run C01 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.
P3needs reviewC03 · Organization and clarity

Review the listed heading transitions and repeated passages; retain intentional policy/boilerplate reuse. Replace a flagged stock phrase only with a more specific supported explanation.

https://northstar.example/implementation
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)

A guided setup for small support teams

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)

How implementation works
Content editor / business owner

Audience familiarity and reason for intentional repeated content

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-run C03 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.
P3needs reviewC04 · Entities and factual context

Ask the owner to verify the cited amount, specification, delivery and region statements against dated authoritative facts. Compare the same offer and conditions; preserve quotation, negation, historical and package context.

https://northstar.example/implementation
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(2)

The assisted Starter package costs USD 99 per month, including onboarding. This differs from the self-serve Starter product plan.

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(3)

A typical implementation takes 10 business days after the owner approves the sample data. Third-party access delays are excluded.
Business owner / content editor

Dated authoritative offer/specification/policy facts and applicable region or package

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-run C04 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.
P3needs reviewC05 · Claims and source support

For each cited candidate, locate the original source and exact supporting passage, confirm date/method and scope, then retain, qualify or correct the claim using verified evidence.

https://northstar.example/implementation
Evidence location

saved response envelope; content acquisition state

No claim candidates were retained by the limited lexical scan. This does not prove the page has no claims or that its claims are supported.
Content editor / business owner

Original supporting source, exact passage, date, method and claim ownership

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-run C05 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.
P3needs reviewC08 · Dates and maintenance

Ask the owner what each published, updated and body date means. Check whether time-sensitive facts remain correct using their original sources; change dates only to reflect a real, verified event.

https://northstar.example/implementation
Evidence location

saved response envelope; content acquisition state

Retained 0 separate date signals; a Last-Modified response header was also observed. Absence of a date does not establish stale content.
Content editor / business owner

Editorial date meaning and authoritative sources for time-sensitive facts

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-run C08 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.
P3not runR07 · Raw and rendered content

If needed, authorize controlled rendering with the same network protections and preserve both snapshots.

https://northstar.example/implementation
Evidence location

raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1)

{'rendered': False, 'raw_noindex': False, 'dom_differs': None, 'rendered_snapshot_ref': None}
Developer

Confirm page intent and locate the applicable CMS setting or passage before editing.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R07 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1).
P3needs reviewR10 · Confirmed business facts

Verify the business source/date, reconcile the quoted conflicting phrase and review context.

https://northstar.example/implementation
Evidence location

raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts

[]
Business owner

Confirm page intent and locate the applicable CMS setting or passage before editing.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R10 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts.
P3needs reviewC01 · Purpose and audience

Confirm the intended visitor, page type and task, then compare the title, opening passage and primary action to that brief; revise only an observed mismatch.

https://northstar.example/product
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h1:nth-of-type(1)

Northstar workspace for support teams

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > h2:nth-of-type(1)

What the workspace does
Content editor / business owner

Confirm page intent and locate the applicable CMS setting or passage before editing.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-run C01 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.
P3needs reviewC08 · Dates and maintenance

Ask the owner what each published, updated and body date means. Check whether time-sensitive facts remain correct using their original sources; change dates only to reflect a real, verified event.

https://northstar.example/product
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > head:nth-of-type(1) > meta:nth-of-type(2)

2026-09-24
Content editor / business owner

Editorial date meaning and authoritative sources for time-sensitive facts

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-run C08 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.
P3not runR07 · Raw and rendered content

If needed, authorize controlled rendering with the same network protections and preserve both snapshots.

https://northstar.example/product
Evidence location

raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1)

{'rendered': False, 'raw_noindex': False, 'dom_differs': None, 'rendered_snapshot_ref': None}
Developer

Confirm page intent and locate the applicable CMS setting or passage before editing.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R07 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html; rendered_dom (not obtained in live V1).
P3needs reviewR10 · Confirmed business facts

Verify the business source/date, reconcile the quoted conflicting phrase and review context.

https://northstar.example/product
Evidence location

raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts

[]
Business owner

Confirm page intent and locate the applicable CMS setting or passage before editing.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R10 v1.0.0; inspect raw_html: visible text; user_confirmed_facts.
P2needs reviewC09 · Relationships in the selected pages

Review cited cross-page passages as the same business offer only after confirming package, region and effective date. Retain useful shared policy text; revise unnecessary repetition or navigation only after confirming its purpose.

selected-scope:https://northstar.example/product
Evidence location

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(8)

All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.

html:nth-of-type(1) > body:nth-of-type(1) > main:nth-of-type(1) > p:nth-of-type(4)

All plans require an existing customer data export. Setup time depends on the quality of the supplied data.
Content editor / business owner

Selected-page roles, authoritative offer facts and intentional reuse/navigation policy

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Re-run C09 v2.0.0 for the same selected URL(s); reopen the listed raw-HTML selectors and compare each passage with confirmed review inputs. Record the owner decision; lexical matching alone is not acceptance.
P3unknownR11 · Sitemap and auxiliary files

Locate the site's actual sitemap if elsewhere; repair only observed XML errors; do not infer indexation.

site:northstar.example
Evidence location

auxiliary snapshots: response status and parsed XML

[]
Developer

Confirm page intent and locate the applicable CMS setting or passage before editing.

CMS / template / file: to be located.

Repeat the same selected URL with rule R11 v1.0.0; inspect auxiliary snapshots: response status and parsed XML.

P1–P3 express relative attention within this report. They do not quantify revenue loss, ranking impact, or citation gains.

07 / LIMITS & EXPORTS

Keep the boundaries with the evidence.

Audit limitations
  • SIMULATED: all website text, business context and AI records are fictional. No customer or live network audit is represented.
  • Three controlled raw-HTML pages; auxiliary files are not provided, so this example is partial.
  • JavaScript was not rendered. Content meaning and source support require human review.
  • Nearby source links do not establish support. Different prices retain region, historical and package context.
  • No overall GEO score, market exposure estimate or guarantee of AI citations.

This is a simulated test fixture. Neither website observations nor AI answer records in this report are live customer measurements.

Measured local execution cost
Mode
controlled_simulation
Llm calls
0
Paid api cost usd
0
Network requests
0

End of report Evidence before inference.